TRANSMITTED EVIDENCE FOR LEGITIMIZING ROLE OF ELECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Valeh Hussein

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAQD VA NAZAR Year:2020 | Volume:25 | Issue:1 (97) Page(s): 163-185

Download Full-Text

View:

250

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TRANSMITTED EVIDENCE FOR LEGITIMIZING ROLE OF ELECTION

Author(s)

Valeh Hussein | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ELECTION

ALLEGIANCE

LEGITIMIZATION

WILāYA (RULE)

Abstract

There is adequate transmitted evidence for the legitimizing role of ELECTION. Opponents of the view suggest that the relevant evidence should not be taken at face value, but such argument is circular. Moreover, their objections to the validity of chains of transmitters of such evidence are unfounded. Their insistence on irrelevance of public ALLEGIANCE (bay‘ a) to actualization of the rule (wilā ya) is based on taking wilā ya to amount to the obligation of obedience— taking the unqualified evidence for obligation of obedience to ground an unconditional rule. The reason why they make a distinction between Infallible (ma‘ ṣ ū m) and non-Infallible rulers vis-à-vis political legitimacy— that is, the enforcement of manipulations and forbiddance of subversion— is that they have confused divine appointment to wilā ya with an independent legislation of a declaratory (waḍ ‘ ī ) law. This will no longer seem odd if we take the appointment to wilā ya as a defining (taklī fī ) law assigning the supervision of people to the ruler; thus, the obligation of his obedience. For we can draw a distinction between essential forbiddance and accidental forbiddance of electing a fallible ruler. In this paper, I deploy the logical analytic method to formulate arguments against the legitimizing role of ELECTION.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Valeh, Hussein. (2020). TRANSMITTED EVIDENCE FOR LEGITIMIZING ROLE OF ELECTION. NAQD VA NAZAR, 25(1 (97) ), 163-185. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/744461/en

Vancouver: Copy

Valeh Hussein. TRANSMITTED EVIDENCE FOR LEGITIMIZING ROLE OF ELECTION. NAQD VA NAZAR[Internet]. 2020;25(1 (97) ):163-185. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/744461/en

IEEE: Copy

Hussein Valeh, “TRANSMITTED EVIDENCE FOR LEGITIMIZING ROLE OF ELECTION,” NAQD VA NAZAR, vol. 25, no. 1 (97) , pp. 163–185, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/744461/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

File Not Exists.

Move to top

وبگردی