Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sheth Mihir; Sholder Daniel; Abboud Joseph; Lazarus Mark; Williams Gerald; Namdari Surena

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery Year:2020 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 Page(s): 147-153

Download Full-Text

View:

167

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?

Author(s)

Keywords

Aseptic glenoid loosening

Hemiarthroplasty

Implant survival

Revision arthroplasty

Shoulder replacement

Total shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: The projected increase in revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in the outcomes of these procedures. Glenoid component removal and conversion to a Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is an option for Aseptic glenoid loosening after anatomic Total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Methods: We identified patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty over a 15-year period. 17 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a retrospective chart review was conducted for pre-surgical and operative data. We contacted patients at a mean follow-up of 70 months from revision surgery for Implant survival, reoperations and functional outcomes scores. Results: Implant survival was estimated to be 88% at 2 years and 67% at 5 years. Mean ASES score for surviving implants was 58 ± 22. Mean SANE score was 54 ± 24, and mean VAS pain score was 3. 5 ± 2. 8. Mean SF-12 Mental and Physical scores were 46 ± 15 and 38 ± 10, respectively. Five patients (50% of those with surviving implants) reported being either very satisfied or satisfied with the status of their shoulder. There were complications in 6 patients (35%) and 5 patients (29%) required reoperation. Conclusion: HA following failed aTSA due to glenoid loosening produced modest clinical results and satisfaction rates. Reverse arthroplasty may be a more reliable treatment strategy in this patient population.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Sheth, Mihir, Sholder, Daniel, Abboud, Joseph, Lazarus, Mark, Williams, Gerald, & Namdari, Surena. (2020). Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, 8(2), 147-153. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/745953/en

Vancouver: Copy

Sheth Mihir, Sholder Daniel, Abboud Joseph, Lazarus Mark, Williams Gerald, Namdari Surena. Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY[Internet]. 2020;8(2):147-153. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/745953/en

IEEE: Copy

Mihir Sheth, Daniel Sholder, Joseph Abboud, Mark Lazarus, Gerald Williams, and Surena Namdari, “Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?,” THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/745953/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops