Quality Assessment of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials in Trauma Monthly Journal

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALESI MAHMOOD; RASOULI HAMIDREZA; MOHAMMADI JAMILE; MOHAMMADI EHSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: TRAUMA MONTHLY Year:2018 | Volume:23 | Issue:1 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Quality Assessment of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials in Trauma Monthly Journal

Author(s)

SALESI MAHMOOD | RASOULI HAMIDREZA | MOHAMMADI JAMILE | MOHAMMADI EHSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Quality Assessment

Randomized Controlled Trial

Checklist

Trauma

Abstract

Context: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have a major role in making the evidence-based decisions on healthcare. Therefore, the assessment of the quality of RCTs is important to properly apply the evidence-based healthcare. The current study aimed at assessing the quality of RCT reports published in Trauma Monthly Journal. Evidence Acquisition: The Quality Assessment of each report was performed using a Checklist based on the CONSORT (consolidated standards of reporting trials) Statement and Jadad criteria. Results: Fifteen RCTs were published from 2011 to 2015 in TraumaMonthly journal out of which 5 (33. 3%) reported the pain outcomes, 7 (46. 6%) reports included surgical interventions, and 3 (33. 3%) reports included patients with different types of fractures. According to theCONSORTChecklist, the best report belonged to the definition of interventions for each groupwith sufficient details. Themean score of Jadad was 2. 27 (45. 4% of maximum possible total score). According to both scales, there was an increase in the periods of time in the quality of reporting. Conclusions: The results showed a moderate quality score in RCTs and an improvement over the years. Training courses for researchers, managing reporting standard tools presented by editors (CONSORT Checklist) and employing methodologists and statistical experts can improve the quality of published RCTs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALESI, MAHMOOD, RASOULI, HAMIDREZA, MOHAMMADI, JAMILE, & MOHAMMADI, EHSAN. (2018). Quality Assessment of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials in Trauma Monthly Journal. TRAUMA MONTHLY, 23(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/753538/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALESI MAHMOOD, RASOULI HAMIDREZA, MOHAMMADI JAMILE, MOHAMMADI EHSAN. Quality Assessment of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials in Trauma Monthly Journal. TRAUMA MONTHLY[Internet]. 2018;23(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/753538/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHMOOD SALESI, HAMIDREZA RASOULI, JAMILE MOHAMMADI, and EHSAN MOHAMMADI, “Quality Assessment of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials in Trauma Monthly Journal,” TRAUMA MONTHLY, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/753538/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops