مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

146
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

82
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception

Pages

  136-142

Abstract

 Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate current Physician ratings websites (PRWs) to determine which factors correlated to higher physician scores and evaluate physician perspective of PRWs. Methods: This study evaluated two popular websites, Healthgrades. com and Vitals. com, to gather information on practicing physician members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society database. A survey was conducted of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) membership to gather data on the perception held by individual physicians regarding PRWs. Results: We found that patients were more likely to give physicians positive reviews and the average overall score was 8. 35 (3. 75-10). Patient wait time (P=0. 052) trended toward significance as a major factor in determining the overall scores, while ratings in both physician bedside manner (P=0. 001) and physician/staff courtesy (P=0. 002) were significant in reflecting the overall score given to the physician. According to our survey, a majority of the respondents were indifferent to highly unfavorable to PRWs (88%) and the validity of their ratings (78%). Conclusion: As PRWs become increasingly popular amongst patients in this digital age, it is critical to understand that the scores are not reflective of a significant proportion of the physicians’ patient population. Physicians can use this study to determine what affects a patient’ s experience and focus efforts on improving patients’ perception of quality, overall satisfaction, and overall care. Consumers may use this study to increase their awareness of the potential for significant sampling error inherent in PRWs when making decisions about their care.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Syed, Usman A., Acevedo, Daniel, Narzikul, Alexa C., Coomer, Wade, Beredjiklian, Pedro K., & Abboud, Joseph A.. (2019). Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, 7(2), 136-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/757305/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Syed Usman A., Acevedo Daniel, Narzikul Alexa C., Coomer Wade, Beredjiklian Pedro K., Abboud Joseph A.. Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY[Internet]. 2019;7(2):136-142. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/757305/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Usman A. Syed, Daniel Acevedo, Alexa C. Narzikul, Wade Coomer, Pedro K. Beredjiklian, and Joseph A. Abboud, “Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception,” THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/757305/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button