مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

163
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

60
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Pain Management Following Anorectal Surgery Using Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs. Pudendal Nerve Block: A Clinical Trial

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: The use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has increased in recent years. Data regarding PCA’ s usefulness following anorectal surgery are equivocal, and it still needs to be further studied and discussed. Therefore, the current study was conducted to compare PCA with pudendal nerve block (PNB) for Pain management in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. Methods: Patients candidate for elective anorectal surgery under general anaesthesia were considered eligible. Prior to the surgery, the patients were divided into PCA and PNB groups. PNB was performed at the end of the surgery just before extubation. PCA was initiated in the recovery room. The patients’ pain scores were recorded based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours into the post-operative period. The total dose of morphine sulfate consumed, the overall satisfaction, and any side effects were recorded. Results: 100 patients with a mean age of 44. 55  11. 45 years were enrolled (71% male). Both methods resulted in effective pain control. The difference in the consumed doses of morphine was not statistically significant (P = 0. 2). The PNB group patients were more satisfied than those in the PCA group (8. 6 1. 9 vs. 7. 3 2. 2; P = 0. 037). The recorded side effects were significantly higher in the PCA group (P < 0. 001). Conclusions: Although both morphine-contained PCA andPNBwith Marcaine resulted in effective pain control following anorectal surgery, it is likely that local anaesthesia with Marcaine is accompanied by fewer side effects and more satisfaction.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NEMATI HONAR, BEHZAD, MIRKHESHTI, ALIREZA, Mahdinezhad, Alireza, & MEMARY, ELHAM. (2018). Pain Management Following Anorectal Surgery Using Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs. Pudendal Nerve Block: A Clinical Trial. TRAUMA MONTHLY, 23(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/759755/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NEMATI HONAR BEHZAD, MIRKHESHTI ALIREZA, Mahdinezhad Alireza, MEMARY ELHAM. Pain Management Following Anorectal Surgery Using Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs. Pudendal Nerve Block: A Clinical Trial. TRAUMA MONTHLY[Internet]. 2018;23(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/759755/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BEHZAD NEMATI HONAR, ALIREZA MIRKHESHTI, Alireza Mahdinezhad, and ELHAM MEMARY, “Pain Management Following Anorectal Surgery Using Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs. Pudendal Nerve Block: A Clinical Trial,” TRAUMA MONTHLY, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/759755/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button