Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofolfentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEIDARI S.M.; SHETABI H.R.; Tarashi Kashani S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2019 | Volume:24 | Issue:2 (100) Page(s): 30-40

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

934

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofolfentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery

Author(s)

HEIDARI S.M. | SHETABI H.R. | Tarashi Kashani S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SedationQ2

KetamineQ2

PropofolQ3

FentanylQ3

CataractQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Considering the importance of proper Sedation in Cataract surgery, this study was conducted to make a comparison between the effects of Ketamine-Propofol combination and Fentanyl-Propofol combination for Sedation in phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: In this clinical trial study, 84 patients who were candidates for phacoemulsification Cataract surgery were assigned to two groups. Each group consisted of 42 patients. KetaminePropofol combination and Fentanyl-Propofol combination were used for induction of Sedation for the first and second groups respectively. We assessed and compared Sedation depth (using Ramsay score), hemodynamic parameters during operation and recovery, and satisfaction of the patients and surgeons between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline variables, demographic characteristics, Sedation index and patient and surgeon satisfaction. There was no significant difference between two groups in relation to blood pressure during operation and recovery periods but the heart rate at the 10th minute of the operation and at the beginning of the recovery in the ketofol group was significantly higher, and also the mean Spo2 was higher in the ketofol group at the 10th minute of operation. Patients in the ketofol group showed less hemodynamic changes. Conclusion: Both combinations of Ketamine-Propofol and Fentanyl-Propofol were associated with the effective Sedation, satisfaction of the patients and the surgeons. But generally, hemodynamic status was more stable in the patients in the ketofol group.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HEIDARI, S.M., SHETABI, H.R., & Tarashi Kashani, S.. (2019). Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofolfentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 24(2 (100) ), 30-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/76832/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEIDARI S.M., SHETABI H.R., Tarashi Kashani S.. Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofolfentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2019;24(2 (100) ):30-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/76832/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. HEIDARI, H.R. SHETABI, and S. Tarashi Kashani, “Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofolfentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery,” SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 24, no. 2 (100) , pp. 30–40, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/76832/en

Related Journal Papers