Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

129
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

73
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession

Pages

  11-17

Abstract

 Background. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of acellular dermal matrix Allograft (ADMA) for the treatment of Gingival recession as a substitute for subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Methods. In this controlled clinical trial, 18 teeth were selected in nine subjects with bilateral Gingival recession. One side was treated with SCTG and a coronally displaced flap as the control group, and the other side was treated with ADMA and a coronally displaced flap as the test group. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level, vertical recession depth, recession width, gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, and the root coverage percentage were measured before the surgery and at,-1-3, and-6month postoperative intervals. The healing index, pain index, and patient satisfaction were also investigated. The data were analyzed with a general linear model (GLM) repeated measures and paired t-test. Results. All the parameters improved except for PPD; however, a comparison between the groups did not reveal statistically significant differences. Only root coverage percentage and pain index were significantly lower in the test group. The average percentage of root coverage in the control and test groups were %16. 62± 82. 01 and %9. 4± 64. 44, respectively. Conclusion. Both methods resulted in improvements in the clinical results. However, the use of the ADMA led to less pain and root coverage in comparison with the SCTG method.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    JENABIAN, NILOOFAR, Yazdanpanahbahabadi, Mohadese, Haghpanah Aski, Parya, & BIJANI, ALI. (2020). Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PERIODONTOLOGY AND IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 12(1), 11-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/776283/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JENABIAN NILOOFAR, Yazdanpanahbahabadi Mohadese, Haghpanah Aski Parya, BIJANI ALI. Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PERIODONTOLOGY AND IMPLANT DENTISTRY[Internet]. 2020;12(1):11-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/776283/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NILOOFAR JENABIAN, Mohadese Yazdanpanahbahabadi, Parya Haghpanah Aski, and ALI BIJANI, “Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PERIODONTOLOGY AND IMPLANT DENTISTRY, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/776283/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top