مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

121
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

107
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting

Pages

  105-114

Abstract

 Background: This study investigated the psychometric properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire– Physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) using comprehensive and thorough psychometric methods in an oncology setting. Methods: Cancer survivors (n = 1783; 928 [52. 05%] males) and physicians (n=154; 121 [78. 58%] males) participated in this study. Each Cancer survivor completed the SDM-Q-9. Physicians completed the SDM-Q-Doc for each of their Cancer patient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch model were used to test the psychometric properties of SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. Results: SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc demonstrated unidimensional structure in CFA and Rasch model. In addition, the measurement invariance was supported for both SDM-Q-9 and SDM-QDoc across sex using the multigroup CFA. Rash analysis indicates no differential item functioning (DIF)across sex for all the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc items. SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc were moderately correlated (r = 0. 41; P < 0. 001). Conclusion: SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc are valid instruments to assess shared decision making in the oncology setting.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NEJATI, BABAK, Lin, Chien Chin, IMANI, VIDA, Browall, Maria, Lin, Chung Ying, Broström, Anders, & H.Pakpour, Amir. (2019). Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES (HPP), 9(2), 105-114. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/780480/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NEJATI BABAK, Lin Chien Chin, IMANI VIDA, Browall Maria, Lin Chung Ying, Broström Anders, H.Pakpour Amir. Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES (HPP)[Internet]. 2019;9(2):105-114. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/780480/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BABAK NEJATI, Chien Chin Lin, VIDA IMANI, Maria Browall, Chung Ying Lin, Anders Broström, and Amir H.Pakpour, “Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting,” HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES (HPP), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/780480/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button