Verification of Sheikh Sadouqh’ s opinion about the sameness of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Taherian Ghadi Masomeh; Musavi Sayed Mohsen; Rabinataj Sayed Ali Akbar; Taghizadeh Tabari Mahdi

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KETAB-E-QAYYEM Year:2021 | Volume:10 | Issue:23 Page(s): 241-260

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Verification of Sheikh Sadouqh’ s opinion about the sameness of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir

Author(s)

Taherian Ghadi Masomeh | Musavi Sayed Mohsen | Rabinataj Sayed Ali Akbar | Taghizadeh Tabari Mahdi | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Similarities and differences

Cited authors

Mo’az Ibn-Moslem

Mo’az Ibn-Kathir

Distinction Sameness

Abstract

When giving references to Hadiths, scholars sometimes face the problem of multiple names for a certain author. In other words, an author may have been recorded with different first names, second names or pennames. In this respect, Sheikh Sadouqh claims that Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir are, indeed, one person. History books as well as books of Hadiths and citations have referred to Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem as Al-Hera, Al-Fera, Bayya Ul-Harvi wa Al-Nahwi and to Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir as Kasayie, Bayya Ul-Aksyeh, Sahib Ul-Aksyeh and Bayya Ul-Karabis. Reports on citations assume authenticity for Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem but not for Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir. Therefore, in case that these two persons are proved to be the same, Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir will emerge as an authentic figure too. As the evidence shows, due to the name resemblance, some recent scholars have attributed the longevity of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem, as the real figure, to Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir, as the referential figure. According to the findings of this research, these two figures have been reported with the same social class, job and living place in many documents. Besides, they have been equally favored by Imam Sadeqh (pbuh). This brings one to the conclusion that Sheikh Sadouqh’ s claim about the sameness of these two persons is correct, and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir is thus authenticated.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Taherian Ghadi, Masomeh, Musavi, Sayed Mohsen, Rabinataj, Sayed Ali Akbar, & Taghizadeh Tabari, Mahdi. (2021). Verification of Sheikh Sadouqh’ s opinion about the sameness of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir. KETAB-E-QAYYEM, 10(23 ), 241-260. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/783895/en

Vancouver: Copy

Taherian Ghadi Masomeh, Musavi Sayed Mohsen, Rabinataj Sayed Ali Akbar, Taghizadeh Tabari Mahdi. Verification of Sheikh Sadouqh’ s opinion about the sameness of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir. KETAB-E-QAYYEM[Internet]. 2021;10(23 ):241-260. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/783895/en

IEEE: Copy

Masomeh Taherian Ghadi, Sayed Mohsen Musavi, Sayed Ali Akbar Rabinataj, and Mahdi Taghizadeh Tabari, “Verification of Sheikh Sadouqh’ s opinion about the sameness of Mo’ az Ibn-Moslem and Mo’ az Ibn-Kathir,” KETAB-E-QAYYEM, vol. 10, no. 23 , pp. 241–260, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/783895/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops