مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,916
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND BONE SCAN TO DIAGNOSE THE VERTEBRAL METASTASES

Pages

  66-70

Abstract

 Background and Objective: The VERTEBRA is the most common site of bone metastases. Diagnosis of metastases particularly in the early stages can improve patients’ prognosis and therapy. This study was done to compare the diagnostic value of MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING and BONE SCAN for the diagnosis of VERTEBRAl metastases.Methods: This descriptive study was done on 43 patients with any types of primary cancer. Patients underwent spinal MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING and nuclear scan. BONE SCAN results were considered as the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING and nuclear scan.Results: The MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING diagnosed 19 cases of thoracic VERTEBRAl metastases which previously diagnosed as negative by BONE SCAN. Sensitivity and specificity of MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING compared to BONE SCAN was 90.7% and 95.6%, respectively. The MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING diagnosed 4 cases of lumbar VERTEBRAl metastases which were reported negative in BONE SCAN. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING in compare to BONE SCAN were 97.6%, 97% and 97.2%, respectively.Conclusion: In diagnosis of VERTEBRAl metastases, the MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING is more sensitive than BONE SCAN.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    FARSHCHIAN, N., FARSHCHIAN, NEGIN, & ASHRAF FALAH, A.. (2014). DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND BONE SCAN TO DIAGNOSE THE VERTEBRAL METASTASES. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 16(1 (49)), 66-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/79115/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FARSHCHIAN N., FARSHCHIAN NEGIN, ASHRAF FALAH A.. DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND BONE SCAN TO DIAGNOSE THE VERTEBRAL METASTASES. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2014;16(1 (49)):66-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/79115/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. FARSHCHIAN, NEGIN FARSHCHIAN, and A. ASHRAF FALAH, “DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND BONE SCAN TO DIAGNOSE THE VERTEBRAL METASTASES,” JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 16, no. 1 (49), pp. 66–70, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/79115/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button