COMPARISON OF EPINEURAL AND PERIPHERAL METHODS IN ULNAR NERVE REPAIR

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TORKASHVAND A.; MOJDEIPANAH H.; EBRAHIMI A.; NADERI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2015 | Volume:17 | Issue:1 (53) Page(s): 1-5

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

980

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EPINEURAL AND PERIPHERAL METHODS IN ULNAR NERVE REPAIR

Author(s)

TORKASHVAND A. | MOJDEIPANAH H. | EBRAHIMI A. | NADERI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NERVE REPAIRQ3

EPINEURALQ2

PERIPHERALQ2

EMGQ2

NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITYQ2

LIGHT TOUCHQ2

PAINQ2

Abstract

Background and Objective: Repair of PERIPHERAL nerve is one of main challenge in surgery and despite improvement in this field less than 50% of cases have functional improvment. This study was done to evaluate the comparison of EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods in ulnar NERVE REPAIR.Method: In this clinical trial study, 28 patients with ulnar nerve injury in distal of forearm were randomly divided equly into EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL surgery methods. After 4 months of surgery, the subjects were examined using with EMG, NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY (NCV) and sensorimotor examination on the first dorsal interosos muscle (FDIM) and abductor digiti minim muscle (ADM).Results: The mean of domain nerve activity, latency nerve activity and NCV in affected upper limb and non affected side had significant differences in EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods (P<0.05). Latency nerve activity and NCV were similar in both methods. The mean of motor unit potential (MUP) was determined in 71% and 64% of patiants in EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods, respectively. Muscle activity of FDIM was observed in 64% and 57% of patients in EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods, respectively. LIGHT TOUCH was determined in 35.7% and 28.5% of patients in EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods, respectively. PAIN was reported in 78.5% and 57% of patients in EPINEURAL and PERIPHERAL methods, respectively.Conclusion: There was no difference between NERVE REPAIR by epineurium and prineurium methods using EMG, NCV and motorosensorial examination.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

TORKASHVAND, A., MOJDEIPANAH, H., EBRAHIMI, A., & NADERI, F.. (2015). COMPARISON OF EPINEURAL AND PERIPHERAL METHODS IN ULNAR NERVE REPAIR. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 17(1 (53)), 1-5. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/79678/en

Vancouver: Copy

TORKASHVAND A., MOJDEIPANAH H., EBRAHIMI A., NADERI F.. COMPARISON OF EPINEURAL AND PERIPHERAL METHODS IN ULNAR NERVE REPAIR. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2015;17(1 (53)):1-5. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/79678/en

IEEE: Copy

A. TORKASHVAND, H. MOJDEIPANAH, A. EBRAHIMI, and F. NADERI, “COMPARISON OF EPINEURAL AND PERIPHERAL METHODS IN ULNAR NERVE REPAIR,” JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 17, no. 1 (53), pp. 1–5, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/79678/en

Related Journal Papers