COMPARISON OF CLOSE REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION AS TREATMENTS FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL RADIUS FRACTURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MANSOURI MEHRDAD; SIAVOSHI B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Yafteh Year:2006 | Volume:8 | Issue:3 (29) Page(s): 23-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,286

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CLOSE REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION AS TREATMENTS FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL RADIUS FRACTURES

Author(s)

MANSOURI MEHRDAD | SIAVOSHI B. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DISTAL RADIUS FRACTUREQ3

CLOSE REDUCTIONQ3

PININGQ3

Abstract

Background: DISTAL RADIUS FRACTUREs are one of the most common fractures of skeletal system and because of the aging of population, its incidence is rising. The aim of the present research was to evaluate the CLOSE REDUCTION and percutaneous pin fixation as a treatment option.Material and methods: 44 patients who were type 2 according to universal classification or type 2 or 3 according to older classification studied for 3 years at 6 months period. Fractures reduced under general anesthesia with Image intensifier and fixed with 2 pins. Results evaluated radiologically in term of radial length radial inclination and volar tilt and clinically by demerit point rating system.Results: Excellent results were achieved in 68% of patients radiologically and in 84% clinically by Demerit point rating system with no obvious deformity in wrist and no complication affected gross function of the patients.Conclusion: Putting the simplicity and minimal invasiveness of the operation and low complication rates, CLOSE REDUCTION and percuteneous pin fixation is an appropriate way to treat distal metaphyseal radius fracture.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MANSOURI, MEHRDAD, & SIAVOSHI, B.. (2006). COMPARISON OF CLOSE REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION AS TREATMENTS FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL RADIUS FRACTURES . YAFTEH, 8(3 (29)), 23-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/80103/en

Vancouver: Copy

MANSOURI MEHRDAD, SIAVOSHI B.. COMPARISON OF CLOSE REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION AS TREATMENTS FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL RADIUS FRACTURES . YAFTEH[Internet]. 2006;8(3 (29)):23-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/80103/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHRDAD MANSOURI, and B. SIAVOSHI, “COMPARISON OF CLOSE REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION AS TREATMENTS FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL RADIUS FRACTURES ,” YAFTEH, vol. 8, no. 3 (29), pp. 23–30, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/80103/en

Related Journal Papers