The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’ s Research Setting

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MohammadRezaei Fakhroddin; FARAJI OMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING REVIEW Year:2019 | Volume:26 | Issue:1 Page(s): 87-122

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,264

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’ s Research Setting

Author(s)

MohammadRezaei Fakhroddin | FARAJI OMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Measurement errorQ1

Audit quality measuresQ1

Output-and input-based measuresQ1

Abstract

Objective: To measure audit quality as a mental concept, different proxies have been implemented by archival research in auditing. Each one of these proxies measures different dimensions of audit quality concept and suffered from more to less errors. The present study focuses on the dilemma of audit quality measuring in Iran. To large extent, audit quality proxies dependent to research’ s institutional setting. In Iran, demand for audit services is mainly based on legal enforcements and litigation risk is also weak. Methods: In addition to the discussion about audit environment in Iran and descriptive analyses in this relation, this study based on output-and input-based proxies of audit quality reviews, discusses, analysis and compares measurement errors of these proxies in Iran and international era. Results: In light with the discussion, suggestions are presented to no use of some the proxies and to implement some alternative and localized measures. Conclusion: The analyses of this study also indicate that using several localized proxies with less measurement errors, paying attention to omitted correlated variables bias and using sophisticated research design to disentangle audit quality from financial reporting quality, are more likely to increase the credibility of the findings of archival studies in this area.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MohammadRezaei, Fakhroddin, & FARAJI, OMID. (2019). The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’ s Research Setting. THE IRANIAN ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING REVIEW, 26(1 ), 87-122. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/8162/en

Vancouver: Copy

MohammadRezaei Fakhroddin, FARAJI OMID. The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’ s Research Setting. THE IRANIAN ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING REVIEW[Internet]. 2019;26(1 ):87-122. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/8162/en

IEEE: Copy

Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei, and OMID FARAJI, “The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’ s Research Setting,” THE IRANIAN ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING REVIEW, vol. 26, no. 1 , pp. 87–122, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/8162/en

Related Journal Papers