مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

9,239
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL AND SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN CESAREAN SECTION OF WOMEN REFERRING TWO HOSPITALS IN TORBATE HEIDARYYEH, IRAN IN 2004

Pages

  48-54

Abstract

 Background and Purpose: CESAREAN SECTION (CS) is a Common obstetric procedure and hence, a lowrisk, appropriate and cost-effective anesthetic method is of importance for both mother and neonate. As almost all CESAREAN SECTIONs in the two hospitals of Torbate Heidarryyeh are performed under general ANESTHESIA due to concern about the complications of Spinal ANESTHESIA, the side effects of the two methods are studied in this research.Methods and Materials: 37 pregnant gravid 1-2 women of 18-30 years old with signal-fetus pregnancy and no other complication who experienced Spinal CESAREAN SECTION were compared with.52 women who experienced CESAREAN SECTION under general ANESTHESIA. The side effects of each method were recorded for 24 hours after the surgery.Results: Mean first-minute Apgar in Spinal Cesarean and ceosarean section by general ANESTHESIA were 8.8±0.3 and 8.3±0.7 respectively which means a statistically significant difference. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significant. Perfect satisfaction in the Spinal subjects was 64.9% and, in the other group was 5.8%.Conclusion: High satisfaction rate, the subject's cooperation in controlling the uterus and prevention of atony, good cooperation in lactation, low headache recurrence in 2.7% of the cases, and low cost are the advantages of the spinal ANESTHESIA and therefore it is recommended for CESAREAN SECTION Candidates.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    JAHANI SHOORAB, N., MIRZAKHANI, K., & HASAN ZADEH, M.. (2005). COMPARISON OF THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL AND SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN CESAREAN SECTION OF WOMEN REFERRING TWO HOSPITALS IN TORBATE HEIDARYYEH, IRAN IN 2004. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 12(2), 48-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82270/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JAHANI SHOORAB N., MIRZAKHANI K., HASAN ZADEH M.. COMPARISON OF THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL AND SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN CESAREAN SECTION OF WOMEN REFERRING TWO HOSPITALS IN TORBATE HEIDARYYEH, IRAN IN 2004. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2005;12(2):48-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82270/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. JAHANI SHOORAB, K. MIRZAKHANI, and M. HASAN ZADEH, “COMPARISON OF THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL AND SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN CESAREAN SECTION OF WOMEN REFERRING TWO HOSPITALS IN TORBATE HEIDARYYEH, IRAN IN 2004,” JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 48–54, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82270/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button