COMPARISON OF THE CALCULATED AND TABULATED METHODS OF ABSORBED DOSE WITH VARIOUS RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI S.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences Year:2005 | Volume:11 | Issue:4 (34) Page(s): 21-26

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

724

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE CALCULATED AND TABULATED METHODS OF ABSORBED DOSE WITH VARIOUS RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES

Author(s)

HOSSEINI S.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ABSORBED DOSEQ2

RADIOLOGY TECHNIQUESQ4

MATHEMATICAL MODELQ3

Abstract

Purpose: As no mathematically - based study was conducted so far, we decided to conduct this study to mathematically compare the ABSORBED DOSEs of radiation. Methods and Material: Seven radiology centers were selected in Gonbad, Golestan to include 140 patients (with confidence level of 95%) for 11 techniques of x-ray such as skull, shoulder, lang, upper and lower digestive tract, hand feet, back and neck. Required data were gathered by a questionnaire focusing on mAs, Kvp, FSD and other items. Results: Findings of the study revealed a decrease in the ABSORBED DOSE of the body surface with various techniques without distortion of the film. ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the means.Conclusion: these findings are not adequate thus requiring a consideration of all factors involved in reduction of the ABSORBED DOSE if a MATHEMATICAL MODEL is to be suggested.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, S.A.. (2005). COMPARISON OF THE CALCULATED AND TABULATED METHODS OF ABSORBED DOSE WITH VARIOUS RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 11(4 (34)), 21-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82572/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI S.A.. COMPARISON OF THE CALCULATED AND TABULATED METHODS OF ABSORBED DOSE WITH VARIOUS RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2005;11(4 (34)):21-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82572/en

IEEE: Copy

S.A. HOSSEINI, “COMPARISON OF THE CALCULATED AND TABULATED METHODS OF ABSORBED DOSE WITH VARIOUS RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES,” JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 4 (34), pp. 21–26, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82572/en

Related Journal Papers