مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

675
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION AND LATERAL AND MEDIAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION IN SUPRACONDYLAR HUMER US FRACTURES IN CHILDREN

Pages

  177-182

Abstract

 Background: Supracondylar HUMERUS fracture is the most common elbow fracture in CHILDren and accounts for about 16% of pediatric fractures. To maintain stability in the reduced segment in medial and lateral columns is an important treatment concept. The aim of this study was to compare two methods of proximal distal lateral pinning with medial and lateral cross pinning.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 140 CHILDren (63 boys, 77 girls) with supracondylar HUMERUS fracture were evaluated in a training center in Tabriz, Iran. The mean age was 5.04 years. The cases were divided into two groups (each 70 patients), matched for age, sex and type of fracture and were treated with two above methods. Complications and outcomes were copmpared.Results: Ulnar nerve lesion in the medial and lateral cross technique was 4.3%, and none in the group done by all lateral pin technique. The need for further surgery and loss of stability was 2.9% and 1.4% respectively with no statistical difference. Pin site infection around the pins was 4.3% and 12.9% percent respectivly. Cubius varus deformity rate was 2.9% in lateral cross pinning and 4/1% in medial lateral cross pinning.Conclusions: Proximal distal cross pinning technique for suprocondylar HUMERUS fracture is comparable to medial and lateral cross pinning in terms of stability in maintaining a good reduction. The possibility of ulnar injury is negated in cross-lateral technique.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ELMI, ASGHAR, ROUHANI, ALIREZA, TABRIZI, ALI, GOLIZADEH, RASOUL, & MIRZATOLOUEI, FARDIN. (2015). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION AND LATERAL AND MEDIAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION IN SUPRACONDYLAR HUMER US FRACTURES IN CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 13(4 (53) ), 177-182. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/85296/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ELMI ASGHAR, ROUHANI ALIREZA, TABRIZI ALI, GOLIZADEH RASOUL, MIRZATOLOUEI FARDIN. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION AND LATERAL AND MEDIAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION IN SUPRACONDYLAR HUMER US FRACTURES IN CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY[Internet]. 2015;13(4 (53) ):177-182. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/85296/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ASGHAR ELMI, ALIREZA ROUHANI, ALI TABRIZI, RASOUL GOLIZADEH, and FARDIN MIRZATOLOUEI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION AND LATERAL AND MEDIAL CROSS-PIN FIXATION IN SUPRACONDYLAR HUMER US FRACTURES IN CHILDREN,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, vol. 13, no. 4 (53) , pp. 177–182, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/85296/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top