AUTHORITY AND CAUSALITY FROM MULLA SADRA AND SPINOSA VIEWPOINTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BRENJKAR R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT) Year:2005 | Volume:1 | Issue:4 Page(s): 43-61

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,212

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AUTHORITY AND CAUSALITY FROM MULLA SADRA AND SPINOSA VIEWPOINTS

Author(s)

BRENJKAR R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CAUSALITYQ2

AUTHORITYQ2

WILLQ2

NECESSITYQ2

POSSIBILITYQ2

ESSENCEQ2

STATEQ3

Abstract

Mulla Sadra held that necessary CAUSALITY has harmony with free WILL but, free WILL put forward by him is the same as determinate. In fact, mulla sadra interpreted WILLer as purpose and believed that human being has WILL but his WILL is caused by yearning is caused by knowledge and knowledge is caused by external factors are caused by god this kind of CAUSALITY is necessary therefore, WILL of human being is necessary when existence of CAUSALITY is, and he can not but make WILLing. In other words, free WILL means ability of human to WILL and to not WILL and in effect, ability to do and not do is impossible and unacceptable on has is of necessary CAUSALITY, therefore, free WILL in mentioned sense does not gather with necessary CAUSALITY though, WILL gather with it. But spinoza expressed freewill not gather with necessary CAUSALITY and because necessary CAUSALITY is obvious human being has not freewill. Spinoza also negated free WILL in meaning of ability to WILL and not WILL from human and also freewill in own special meaning namely, doing of act as nature of agent requires Spinoza also like mulla sadra regarded human wilier, but he did not interpreted wilier as purpose as mulla sadra did and in effect expressed human has not free WILL the kind of CAUSALITY was accepted by spinoza is different with mulla sadra’s. philosophical view and similar to view of mystics accepted sometime by Mulla Sadra. Spinoza interpreted relation God with creations with internal CAUSALITY on basis of this CAUSALITY, cause and effect are not two accidents or substances in along or in beside together, but effects of modes of cause or substance of God. This view as attitude of manifestation of mystics impaling one being and it’s manifestation involve one substance and its modes.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BRENJKAR, R.. (2005). AUTHORITY AND CAUSALITY FROM MULLA SADRA AND SPINOSA VIEWPOINTS. ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT), 1(4), 43-61. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86359/en

Vancouver: Copy

BRENJKAR R.. AUTHORITY AND CAUSALITY FROM MULLA SADRA AND SPINOSA VIEWPOINTS. ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT)[Internet]. 2005;1(4):43-61. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/86359/en

IEEE: Copy

R. BRENJKAR, “AUTHORITY AND CAUSALITY FROM MULLA SADRA AND SPINOSA VIEWPOINTS,” ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 43–61, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/86359/en

Related Journal Papers