ON THE ORIGINALITY OF KUHN'S THEORY OF SCIENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIANDARI HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES Year:2010 | Volume:16 | Issue:62 Page(s): 89-110

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,005

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ON THE ORIGINALITY OF KUHN'S THEORY OF SCIENCE

Author(s)

MIANDARI HASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KUHNQ3

PARADIGMQ2

NORMAL SCIENCEQ3

SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONQ2

HEIDEGGERQ3

DISCIPLINARY MATRIXQ3

EXEMPLARQ2

Abstract

Thomas KUHN proposed an original theory of science in 1962. Some scholars have claimed that what KUHN called "paradigm," "normal science" and "scientific revolution" had been mentioned by HEIDEGGER. For PARADIGM, they invoke mathematical nature of modern science, the need to interpretative worlds, and the horizon of knowledge. For NORMAL SCIENCE, the main basis is the projection of a ground plan. And, for SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION, resistance of anomalies and radical revision in fundamental concepts of science are mentioned. We reject all these claims. KUHN in his postscript to the second edition of Structure distinguished between "disciplinary matrix" and "exemplar." The latter is neglected by those scholars. The former was composed of four elements and was dependent on a particular community of specialists. But neither is considered by those scholars. KUHN said that in NORMAL SCIENCE scientists solve puzzles. However, according to those scholars, HEIDEGGER had said that scientists do other things. Anomalies were not sufficient for SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION according to KUHN. But they had been considered sufficient according to some scholars. I conclude that HEIDEGGER had not had philosophical priority over KUHN in these subjects.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MIANDARI, HASSAN. (2010). ON THE ORIGINALITY OF KUHN'S THEORY OF SCIENCE. METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, 16(62), 89-110. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/88351/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIANDARI HASSAN. ON THE ORIGINALITY OF KUHN'S THEORY OF SCIENCE. METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2010;16(62):89-110. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/88351/en

IEEE: Copy

HASSAN MIANDARI, “ON THE ORIGINALITY OF KUHN'S THEORY OF SCIENCE,” METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, vol. 16, no. 62, pp. 89–110, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/88351/en

Related Journal Papers