PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING ANNOTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ABDI LEILA; SAYADKUH AKBAR; TAHERIAN AMENEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,997

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING ANNOTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Author(s)

ABDI LEILA | SAYADKUH AKBAR | TAHERIAN AMENEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHYQ2

DESCRIPTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHYQ2

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHYQ2

CRITICAL BIBLIOGRAPHYQ2

Abstract

Purpose: composing and formulating BIBLIOGRAPHY is key activity in scientific area. It is necessary to conduct this activity on the basis of an organized and coherent framework in order to prevent wasting time and cost, unwillingness of audiences, incoherency of book description/analysis structure, and imperfect evaluation. Since the lack of such tool to formulation of bibliographies is evident with respect to literature review, the purpose of this research is to produce a descriptive-annotated framework.Methodology: This study is a documentary research. Since the research approach was qualitative, the purposive sampling was used. So, three following kinds of resources related to the research problem, were studied: 1) Bibliographic resources (400 books), 2) English bibliographic frameworks (in bounded level), 3) methodology and reference work resources in the library and information science area. In addition, the saturation principle was considered in data gathering and analyzing. In order to data gathering, necessary criteria for preparing proposed framework were extracted from the resources. Then the recorded data was analyzed in the qualitative content analysis way and classified to the related categories. Refining the prepared framework was continued up to the terminating the research, and its'' reliability was evaluated based on the professionals opinions and by testing on 10 books in myth area.Findings: The final framework includes two main parts: descriptive and annotated. 3 sub-categories of the first part are: bibliographic information, a brief introduction to the author and its'' works and book chapters and outline. The annotated part includes subject oriented and critical sections that the first section includes the author purpose in terms of subject, author purpose in terms of kinds of audience, and the kind of work in terms of affecting. In the critical section that is the main part of the framework, 20 following subcategories were extracted: Book print, the publisher credit, the author credit, consistency between book’s title and content, table of contents, evaluating of the preface and introduction, style and prose, book unique attribute, analyzing the content, the extent of achieving to purpose by author in terms of subject and of coherency with audiences, the coverage extent of book key issues, author’s view or bias, book contents independency, conclusion, tables and examples, footnotes, references, indices and translation quality. Finally some suggestions based on this research were offered for the future studies and conducting similar researches.Originality/value: The new, comprehensive and precise framework proposed by this research can be suitable for formulation and evaluation of bibliographies. Besides, it can be a good reference for authors, researchers, critics and audiences to make purposeful and coherent book review, analysis and description.

Cites

No record.

References

کتابشناسی نخستین گام اطلاع رسانی است

Cite

APA: Copy

ABDI, LEILA, SAYADKUH, AKBAR, & TAHERIAN, AMENEH. (2013). PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING ANNOTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES. RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE)), 19(1 (72)), 21-51. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/88776/en

Vancouver: Copy

ABDI LEILA, SAYADKUH AKBAR, TAHERIAN AMENEH. PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING ANNOTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES. RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE))[Internet]. 2013;19(1 (72)):21-51. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/88776/en

IEEE: Copy

LEILA ABDI, AKBAR SAYADKUH, and AMENEH TAHERIAN, “PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING ANNOTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES,” RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE)), vol. 19, no. 1 (72), pp. 21–51, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/88776/en

Related Journal Papers