A COMPARATIVE CONSIDERATION OF ARGUMENT FOR GOD’ S EXISTENCE FROM CONSCIOUSNESS: SWINBURNE AND MULLā Ṣ ADRā

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Kurd Firuzjaei Yar Ali

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAQD VA NAZAR Year:2020 | Volume:25 | Issue:1 (97) Page(s): 141-161

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

633

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE CONSIDERATION OF ARGUMENT FOR GOD’ S EXISTENCE FROM CONSCIOUSNESS: SWINBURNE AND MULLā Ṣ ADRā

Author(s)

Kurd Firuzjaei Yar Ali | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GOD’S EXISTENCEQ1

CONSCIOUSNESSQ2

RATIONAL PERCEPTIONQ1

MULLāṢADRāQ2

SWINBURNEQ1

Abstract

There is an argument for God’ s existence from CONSCIOUSNESS. The argument was initially formulated by SWINBURNE in contemporary Western philosophy. He claims that no one has preceded him in formulating the argument, except John Locke who had a vague reference to it. The argument considers the existence of mental phenomena, such as feelings, emotions, intentions, and thoughts— which are scientifically unexplainable and merely admit of subjective explanations— as evidence for God’ s existence. SWINBURNE provides an inductive versions of the argument, which confirms and reinforces the probability of God’ s existence. A survey of arguments for God’ s existence in Islamic philosophical tradition reveals that Mullā Ṣ adra was the first philosopher who argued for God’ s existence from rational CONSCIOUSNESS. His argument is syllogistic and certainty-conferring. This paper deploys a descriptive-analytic method to consider the two versions of the argument from CONSCIOUSNESS for God’ s existence in Western and Islamic philosophical traditions, comparing their agreements, distinctions, weaknesses, and strengths.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Kurd Firuzjaei, Yar Ali. (2020). A COMPARATIVE CONSIDERATION OF ARGUMENT FOR GOD’ S EXISTENCE FROM CONSCIOUSNESS: SWINBURNE AND MULLā Ṣ ADRā. NAQD VA NAZAR, 25(1 (97) ), 141-161. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89652/en

Vancouver: Copy

Kurd Firuzjaei Yar Ali. A COMPARATIVE CONSIDERATION OF ARGUMENT FOR GOD’ S EXISTENCE FROM CONSCIOUSNESS: SWINBURNE AND MULLā Ṣ ADRā. NAQD VA NAZAR[Internet]. 2020;25(1 (97) ):141-161. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89652/en

IEEE: Copy

Yar Ali Kurd Firuzjaei, “A COMPARATIVE CONSIDERATION OF ARGUMENT FOR GOD’ S EXISTENCE FROM CONSCIOUSNESS: SWINBURNE AND MULLā Ṣ ADRā,” NAQD VA NAZAR, vol. 25, no. 1 (97) , pp. 141–161, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89652/en

Related Journal Papers