COMPARING RESULTS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS EVALUATION IN COMPUTER USERS WITH CMDQ, RULA AND ROSA METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOHRABI M.S.; FARIDIZAD A.; FARASATI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2015 | Volume:23 | Issue:4 (SUPPLEMENT) Page(s): 53-62

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

969

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING RESULTS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS EVALUATION IN COMPUTER USERS WITH CMDQ, RULA AND ROSA METHODS

Author(s)

SOHRABI M.S. | FARIDIZAD A. | FARASATI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MSDSQ2

CMDQQ2

RULAQ2

ROSAQ2

OFFICE STAFFQ2

Abstract

Introduction: More than 60% of the OFFICE STAFF in developing countries complain about physical discomfort that many of the discomforts associated with musculoskeletal disorders. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among developing countries, according to the type and duration of work with computers, between 15 to 70% has been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate musculoskeletal disorders in computer users and determination of correlation between the results of CMDQ, RULA and ROSA methods.Materials & methods: Participants were 71 office users that were selected using systematic random sampling. The method used in this correlation study was using CMDQ questionnaire and evaluation of those methods.Findings: According to the final results of the RULA 46% of participants were in risk level 3 and 4 (ergonomic intervention) and results of the ROSA 21% as low risk, 48% as medium risk and 31% were at high risk. Also there is a significant relationship between the risk level of two method results (p<0.05).Discussion & Conclusion: Two evaluation methods have a high correlation to estimated risk levels of musculoskeletal disorders and they can be used as an alternative method to assessment of ergonomic risk of office environments.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SOHRABI, M.S., FARIDIZAD, A., & FARASATI, F.. (2015). COMPARING RESULTS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS EVALUATION IN COMPUTER USERS WITH CMDQ, RULA AND ROSA METHODS. JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 23(4 (SUPPLEMENT)), 53-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89890/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOHRABI M.S., FARIDIZAD A., FARASATI F.. COMPARING RESULTS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS EVALUATION IN COMPUTER USERS WITH CMDQ, RULA AND ROSA METHODS. JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2015;23(4 (SUPPLEMENT)):53-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89890/en

IEEE: Copy

M.S. SOHRABI, A. FARIDIZAD, and F. FARASATI, “COMPARING RESULTS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS EVALUATION IN COMPUTER USERS WITH CMDQ, RULA AND ROSA METHODS,” JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 23, no. 4 (SUPPLEMENT), pp. 53–62, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89890/en

Related Journal Papers