COMPARISON OF 13TH AD LOGICIANS' POINT OF VIEW AND GELENBEVI IN THEORY OF SYLLOGISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

EHSANI NIK MALIHE

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY) Year:2014 | Volume:41 | Issue:2 Page(s): 121-137

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

763

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF 13TH AD LOGICIANS' POINT OF VIEW AND GELENBEVI IN THEORY OF SYLLOGISM

Author(s)

EHSANI NIK MALIHE | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SYLLOGISMQ2

CONTROVERSIAL SYLLOGISMQ2

RELATIVE SYLLOGISMQ2

Abstract

The traditional logician’s explanation on categorical SYLLOGISM, make the analysis of controversial SYLLOGISM and other relative SYLLOGISM, very difficult. The thirteenth century logicians use two methods to solve this problem. One method is Ibn Sina's method, which adds a premise to SYLLOGISM, and the second method is Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Katebis’ method, which provide SYLLOGISM relying on middle terms and without adding a premise. In eighteenth century, Gelenbevi tried to find another way of closer justification on these SYLLOGISMs, by using other analysis on relative SYLLOGISM. The traditional logician’s explanation on categorical SYLLOGISM, make the analysis of controversial SYLLOGISM and other relative SYLLOGISM, very difficult. The thirteenth century logicians use two methods to solve this problem. One method is Ibn Sina's method, which adds a premise to SYLLOGISM, and the second method is Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Katebis’ method, which provide SYLLOGISM relying on middle terms and without adding a premise. In eighteenth century, Gelenbevi tried to find another way of closer justification on these SYLLOGISMs, by using other analysis on relative SYLLOGISM.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

EHSANI NIK, MALIHE. (2014). COMPARISON OF 13^TH AD LOGICIANS' POINT OF VIEW AND GELENBEVI IN THEORY OF SYLLOGISM. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), 41(2), 121-137. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/93717/en

Vancouver: Copy

EHSANI NIK MALIHE. COMPARISON OF 13^TH AD LOGICIANS' POINT OF VIEW AND GELENBEVI IN THEORY OF SYLLOGISM. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2014;41(2):121-137. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/93717/en

IEEE: Copy

MALIHE EHSANI NIK, “COMPARISON OF 13^TH AD LOGICIANS' POINT OF VIEW AND GELENBEVI IN THEORY OF SYLLOGISM,” FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/93717/en

Related Journal Papers