مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

132
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of the Ontology of Meaning in the Views of Fayḍ Kāshānī and ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī

Pages

  98-126

Abstract

 The ontology of meaning seeks to find the truth and nature of the meanings of words; that is, it search The nature of meaning. Western intellectuals have dealt with the problem, providing a variety of theories in this regard, such as the token theory, the conceptual theory, the pictorial theory, and so on. Given the particular position of the issue in Quranic exegesis, the principles of jurisprudence, and certain theological problems, Muslim scholars need to provide an account for it. Thus, in this paper we deploy the descriptive-analytic method to reread and account for the views of two prominent Shiite scholars and exegetes, Fayḍ Kā shā nī and ‘ Allā ma Ṭ abā ṭ abā ’ ī . Having considered their theory of the “ spirit of meaning” — which is an important theory in Quranic exegesis and on which both insist, with remarkable agreements between the two views— we argue that this cannot be endorsed as a “ theory of meaning” although some people have tried to derive a theory of meaning from it, since it offers no answer to the question of what meaning is. On this account, although there are statements in their work which might imply their inclination toward a token or pictorial theory of meaning, they both endorse only the ideational (conceptual) theory of meaning.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Mansur Samai, Mohammad Javad, MAHDAVIRAD, MOHAMMAD ALI, & PURROSTAMI, HAMED. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Ontology of Meaning in the Views of Fayḍ Kāshānī and ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī. NAQD VA NAZAR, 25(3 (99) ), 98-126. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/954157/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Mansur Samai Mohammad Javad, MAHDAVIRAD MOHAMMAD ALI, PURROSTAMI HAMED. A Comparative Study of the Ontology of Meaning in the Views of Fayḍ Kāshānī and ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī. NAQD VA NAZAR[Internet]. 2020;25(3 (99) ):98-126. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/954157/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mohammad Javad Mansur Samai, MOHAMMAD ALI MAHDAVIRAD, and HAMED PURROSTAMI, “A Comparative Study of the Ontology of Meaning in the Views of Fayḍ Kāshānī and ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī,” NAQD VA NAZAR, vol. 25, no. 3 (99) , pp. 98–126, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/954157/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button