مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

169
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Symmetric Validation of Exegetical Narrations from the Viewpoint of Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ‘ Alam al Hudá

Pages

  267-292

Keywords

Knowledge providing of conjectures (circumstantial evidence) 

Abstract

 The validation of Exegetical narrations has long been discussed. Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ‘ Alam al Hudá , as a prominent Shiite scholar in the fifth century, is one of the Qur'anic scholars whose views on this issue are of particular importance. This article, which is organized in a descriptive-analytical method by referring to the works of Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā , has examined his approach in validating Exegetical narrations. It seems at first glance, that since Exegetical narrations are considered as traditions with a single narrator (Arabic: اخبار آحاد, Romanized: Akhbā r Aḥ ā d) and Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā does not consider tradition with a single narrator which causes conjecture for knowledge and action. He should not give credit for Exegetical narrations, but the findings of this article indicate that Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ’ s view can also be cited in exegesis; if the tradition with a single narrator is accompanied by conjectures that excludes (removes) it from being suspicious. Conjectures such as: the existence of traditions in ḥ adī th works and Shi'a (Shiite) principles, knowledge providing of the content of the tradition, conformity with the apparent of the Qur'an, conformity with the ruling (verdict) of reason, conformity with the principle of the Justice of God, and Imami consensus can remove the narration from being conjecture. In fact, Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā believes in a Symmetrical validation approach in evaluating ḥ adī ths in contrast to the narrator validation approach.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Hosseinpour, Muhammad Hossein, Mortazavi, S.Muhammad, & JAVAHERI, MOHAMMAD REZA. (2022). Symmetric Validation of Exegetical Narrations from the Viewpoint of Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ‘ Alam al Hudá. QURANIC DOCTRINES, 19(35 ), 267-292. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/959562/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Hosseinpour Muhammad Hossein, Mortazavi S.Muhammad, JAVAHERI MOHAMMAD REZA. Symmetric Validation of Exegetical Narrations from the Viewpoint of Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ‘ Alam al Hudá. QURANIC DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2022;19(35 ):267-292. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/959562/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Muhammad Hossein Hosseinpour, S.Muhammad Mortazavi, and MOHAMMAD REZA JAVAHERI, “Symmetric Validation of Exegetical Narrations from the Viewpoint of Sayyid al-Murtaḍ ā ‘ Alam al Hudá,” QURANIC DOCTRINES, vol. 19, no. 35 , pp. 267–292, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/959562/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button