COMPARISON OF PATIENTS ADMITTED DUE TO PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDING TO HISTORY OF CRACK ABUSE IN IMAM HOSSIEN HOSPITAL (2006-2007)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NIK SHOAR M.R.; ESFANDI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,335

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PATIENTS ADMITTED DUE TO PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDING TO HISTORY OF CRACK ABUSE IN IMAM HOSSIEN HOSPITAL (2006-2007)

Author(s)

NIK SHOAR M.R. | ESFANDI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRACKQ3

PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERQ3

SUBSTANCE ABUSEQ3

Abstract

Background: Relation of CRACK abuse and peptic ulcer is presented from several years ago, now with increasing substances abuse, CRACK abuse is mentioned as one cause for increasing peptic ulcer arid its complications. In this survey we compared patients admitted due to PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER according to history of CRACK abusing for better evaluation of them and reducing of miss diagnosis.Materials and Methods: In this study we evaluate 120 patients 119 male and 1 female admitted due to PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, we put them in two groups based on CRACK abusing history and compared them for pre, intra and post operative findings.Results: From 120 patients 42 (35%) had history of CRACK abuse and 78 (65%) had not this history, CXR was positive in 47.6% of CRACK abusers and in 76.9% of non abuse patients, WBC in CRACK abusers was about 11500 and in non abusers about 15000, perforations were mostly pyloric and perpyloric with sever contamination of peritoneal cavity in CRACK positives and gastric and deoudenal with less peritoneal contamination in CRACK negative patients.Conclusion: the results show that CRACK abuse patients are younger with less positive CXRs and leucocytosis despite of most peritoneal contamination, therefore evaluation of these patients should be with cautions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NIK SHOAR, M.R., & ESFANDI, H.. (2008). COMPARISON OF PATIENTS ADMITTED DUE TO PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDING TO HISTORY OF CRACK ABUSE IN IMAM HOSSIEN HOSPITAL (2006-2007). ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 5(4 (SERIAL NUMBER 20)), 1395-1399. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/96798/en

Vancouver: Copy

NIK SHOAR M.R., ESFANDI H.. COMPARISON OF PATIENTS ADMITTED DUE TO PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDING TO HISTORY OF CRACK ABUSE IN IMAM HOSSIEN HOSPITAL (2006-2007). ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH[Internet]. 2008;5(4 (SERIAL NUMBER 20)):1395-1399. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/96798/en

IEEE: Copy

M.R. NIK SHOAR, and H. ESFANDI, “COMPARISON OF PATIENTS ADMITTED DUE TO PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDING TO HISTORY OF CRACK ABUSE IN IMAM HOSSIEN HOSPITAL (2006-2007),” ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, vol. 5, no. 4 (SERIAL NUMBER 20), pp. 1395–1399, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/96798/en

Related Journal Papers