مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

58
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

296
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Four Data Mining Algorithms for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Risk

Pages

  100-108

Abstract

 Background & Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in the world. The early detection of CRC is not only a simple process but also is the key to treatment. Data mining algorithms could be potentially useful in cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment. Therefore, the main focus of this study is to measure the performance of some Data mining classifier algorithms in predicting CRC and providing an early warning to the high-risk groups. Materials & Methods: This study was performed on 468 subjects, including 194 CRC patients and 274 non-CRC cases. We used the CRC dataset from Imam Hospital, Sari, Iran. The Chi-square feature selection method was utilized to analyze the risk factors. Next, four popular Data mining algorithms were compared in terms of their performance in predicting CRC, and, finally, the best algorithm was identified. Results: The best outcome was obtained by J-48 with F-measure=0. 826, receiver operating characteristic (ROC)=0. 881, precision=0. 826, and sensitivity =0. 827. Bayesian net was the second-best performer (F-Measure=0. 718, ROC=0. 784, precision=0. 719, and sensitivity=0. 722) followed by random forest (F-Measure=0. 705, ROC=0. 758, precision=0. 719, and sensitivity=0. 712). The multilayer perceptron technique had the worst performance (F-Measure=0. 702, ROC=0. 76, precision=0. 701, and sensitivity=0. 703). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, J-48 could provide better insights than other proposed Prediction models for clinical applications.

Cites

References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa, Nopour, Raoof, & Kazemi Arpanahi, Hadi. (2021). Comparison of Four Data Mining Algorithms for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Risk. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 29(133), 100-108. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/981422/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Shanbehzadeh Mostafa, Nopour Raoof, Kazemi Arpanahi Hadi. Comparison of Four Data Mining Algorithms for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Risk. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2021;29(133):100-108. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/981422/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mostafa Shanbehzadeh, Raoof Nopour, and Hadi Kazemi Arpanahi, “Comparison of Four Data Mining Algorithms for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Risk,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, vol. 29, no. 133, pp. 100–108, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/981422/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button