مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,562
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL SURVEY OF AYATOLLAH JAVADI AMOLI’S THEORY OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE

Pages

  107-128

Abstract

 Muslim scholars have put forward various expositions pertaining to RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE. One of the innovative viewpoints on this matter belongs to AYATOLLAH JAVADI AMOLI. As an advocate of RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE, he maintains that for knowledge to be truly knowledge (not illusion or imagination) there should be a religiosity; knowledge is nothing but religious. To ascribe religiosity to all kinds of human knowledge is to meet the requisite of exactness and methodicality for any so-called scientific propositions. Authentic knowledge is to interpret the divine creation and acts, and giving explanation for divine act is an Islamic doctrine despite the fact that the knower is not able to grasp it and considers God’s creation to be nature itself. This viewpoint does have fundamental backgrounds and presuppositions with which the authors have proceeded by referring to and analyzing the elementary principles in his authored works. In the end, some criticisms of his view will be presented. In the realm of RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE, this theory, despite its systematicity, encounters such serious problems as confused reasoning on divine, religious and Islamic concepts; internal inconsistency; methodological incompetency; admissibility of using “creation” instead of “nature”; objectionability of consequences of considering all branches of knowledge as religious. What impels this theory to be inefficient lies mostly in its whole reliance on the actual state (or substance level) than the apparent state (or assertion level).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KARAMI, MOHAMMAD, & DANESHSHAHRAKI, HABIBOLLAH. (2017). A CRITICAL SURVEY OF AYATOLLAH JAVADI AMOLI’S THEORY OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 18(2 (70)), 107-128. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98146/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KARAMI MOHAMMAD, DANESHSHAHRAKI HABIBOLLAH. A CRITICAL SURVEY OF AYATOLLAH JAVADI AMOLI’S THEORY OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;18(2 (70)):107-128. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98146/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD KARAMI, and HABIBOLLAH DANESHSHAHRAKI, “A CRITICAL SURVEY OF AYATOLLAH JAVADI AMOLI’S THEORY OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 18, no. 2 (70), pp. 107–128, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98146/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button