A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR EXPLANATORY MODELS TO JUSTIFY THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FAZELI SEYYED AHMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2017 | Volume:19 | Issue:1 (71) Page(s): 105-127

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

581

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR EXPLANATORY MODELS TO JUSTIFY THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICISM

Author(s)

FAZELI SEYYED AHMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EXPLANATORY MODELQ1

EFFABILITY OF MYSTICISMQ1

ANTHROPOMORPHISM AND PURIFICATIONQ2

ILLUSIONQ2

MANIFESTATIONQ2

Abstract

There are four different models to explain the language of mysticism and its effability: (1) the model of memory (stating the experience of intuition); (2) the model of intuitive intellect; (3) the model of anthropomorphism; and (4) the model of MANIFESTATION. The first model negates explaining while intuiting, but states that explaining the experience of intuition is possible after the intuition because it is possible to classify and conceptualize it. By accepting a function of intellect called intuition, the second model states that intellect functioning as heart and intellectual intuition in the context of intuition by heart is possible, which results in the direct involvement of intellectual explanation. The third model states that "effability" of mysticism means explaining the reality of existence (individual unity) through words and concepts, and ILLUSION whose function is image-making is in charge of anthropomorphism and assisted by intellectual purification, which results in understanding anthropomorphizing while purifying. The forth model states that explanation is the very MANIFESTATION of divine names in the form of words (manifestation of the name of names) and since the divine names are themselves the MANIFESTATION of Truth, explanation or the name of name is the MANIFESTATION of divine essence and its explanation. By comparing these models and reviewing their merits and demerits, it can be said that possible effability is justified and is an intellectual method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FAZELI, SEYYED AHMAD. (2017). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR EXPLANATORY MODELS TO JUSTIFY THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICISM. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 19(1 (71)), 105-127. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98276/en

Vancouver: Copy

FAZELI SEYYED AHMAD. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR EXPLANATORY MODELS TO JUSTIFY THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICISM. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;19(1 (71)):105-127. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98276/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED AHMAD FAZELI, “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR EXPLANATORY MODELS TO JUSTIFY THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICISM,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 19, no. 1 (71), pp. 105–127, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98276/en

Related Journal Papers