مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

29
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

8
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: Both transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) can provide effective analgesia for abdominal surgery. Objectives: To explore whether there are differences in the effects of TAPB and QLB on the quality of postoperative recovery in Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer. Methods: In total, 102 Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer were randomly divided into two groups. Bilateral TAPB or QLB was performed using 0. 375% ropivacaine after the induction of anesthesia. The 15-item Quality of recovery (QoR15) scale was used to assess the Quality of recovery at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary indicators included 24-h postoperative fentanyl consumption, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), incidence of adverse reactions, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and during exercise, and incidence of postoperative complications. Results: QoR-15 scores were higher in the QLB group than in the TAPB group (115. 6±, 11. 3 vs. 99. 7±, 14. 2, P<0. 05). Moreover, the 24-h sufentanil consumption was less in the QLB group than in the TAPB group (2. 4±, 0. 5 vs. 5. 5±, 0. 3 μ, g, P<0. 05) after surgery. Time durations to first postoperative PCA compression were 152. 1±, 28. 4 and 100. 3 ±,22. 9 min, respectively (P<0. 05). The numbers of PCA compressions within 24 h after surgery were 6. 0 (2. 0, 8. 0) and 9. 0 (3. 0, 12. 0) (P<0. 05). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, such as adverse reactions, NRS scores at rest and exercise at 24 h postoperatively, as well as complication rates. Conclusion: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer with QLB had a better Quality of recovery and better Analgesic effects at 24 h postoperatively, compared to TAPB.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Li, Longcheng, Xu, Yang, Jiang, Fei, & ZHANG, XUE. (2022). Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), 24(3), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/994041/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Li Longcheng, Xu Yang, Jiang Fei, ZHANG XUE. Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ)[Internet]. 2022;24(3):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/994041/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Longcheng Li, Yang Xu, Fei Jiang, and XUE ZHANG, “Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer,” IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 0–0, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/994041/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button