Introduction: The state model in Iran is unitary and centralized. In such a model, the political power is completely in the disposal of the central state, and it is given to other subpart units. Because of the existence of a unitary state, the space distribution of the political power is impossible. However, in the national and local levels, the state and popular organizations are selected by the people directly or indirectly. Rural boards are organizations, which due to executive and official decentralization manage the rural areas. However, it seems that rural boards do not have enough ability in the management of rural areas and are mostly the agents of state organizations rather than being independent, local and popular organizations. Therefor, the main question in this study is that why rural boards, in spite of expectations, do not have a significant role in the development of rural areas. In order to answer this question, satisfaction, knowledge and decision making abilities of the rural board members of two cities, namely Khoy (in West Azarbayjan province) and Noor (in Mazandaran province) were investigated.Materials and Methods: The methodology used in this study is descriptive-analytic and the instruments for gathering data are questionnaire and interview.Results and Discussion: After confirming the significant relationship among the variables, it has been indicated that the satisfaction variables of the role that the boards play have the most direct effect compared with knowledge and decision making abilities, and it can explain for 40 percent of the variables for rural development. Also the scope of the ability variable through the intervening variable of the board performance has the most effect on the rural development. However, generally spreading, 68 percent of the board members have announced that they have limited power in decision making, 57 percent have maintained that they do not have enough information about their responsibility and finally, 53 percent have declared that they are not satisfied with their job (it is worth mentioning that these variables were measured based on an index and the analysis of their causes has been explained in the study).Conclusion: Boards, as a symbol of political development, shoud be responsible for the management of local affairs and pave the way for the participation of the region residents in their own affairs. If boards enjoy an appropriate administrative position, they can make the scope of the governmental smaller, and through creating a flow structure help the people out of the complex beureucracy of the government. Boards as a symbol of democracy, for if they want to enjoy an appropriate position in the society, need cultural endeavour, which is a long-term process and cannot be done on a short-term basis.