A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Mendieta Nuria; Suarez Joel; Blasco Cristina; Muniz Romina; Pueyo Carmen

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology Year:2021 | Volume:33 | Issue:3 Page(s): 247-252

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

128

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients

Author(s)

Keywords

Glaucoma

SITA Faster

Visual field

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of the new strategy Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Faster to the results of SITA Standard in patients with Glaucoma. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 49 patients with Glaucoma and previous experience with standard automated perimetry. Two consecutive tests were performed in random order, one with SITA Standard and another one with SITA Faster, in the studied eye of each patient. Comparisons were made for test time, mean deviation (MD), Visual field index (VFI), and number of depressed points in pattern deviation map and total deviation map for every level of significance. Results: The average test time was 56% shorter with SITA Faster (P < 0. 001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for MD and VFI showed excellent agreement between both strategies, ICC = 0. 98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 96, 0. 99) and ICC = 0. 97 (95% CI: 0. 95, 0. 99), respectively. For the number of depressed points in total deviation map and pattern deviation map, ICC demonstrated good agreement with values between 0. 8 and 0. 95. Conclusions: Our study shows that SITA Faster is a shorter test with strong agreement with SITA Standard parameters. These results suggest that SITA Faster could replace SITA Standard for Glaucoma diagnosis.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Mendieta, Nuria, Suarez, Joel, Blasco, Cristina, Muniz, Romina, & Pueyo, Carmen. (2021). A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients. JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 33(3), 247-252. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1041354/en

Vancouver: Copy

Mendieta Nuria, Suarez Joel, Blasco Cristina, Muniz Romina, Pueyo Carmen. A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients. JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY[Internet]. 2021;33(3):247-252. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1041354/en

IEEE: Copy

Nuria Mendieta, Joel Suarez, Cristina Blasco, Romina Muniz, and Carmen Pueyo, “A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients,” JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1041354/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops