AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE LATENCY: HEADPHONE VERSUS BONE VIBRATOR PROCEDURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ROUZBAHANI M.; KEYHANI MOHAMMAD REZA; HADDADZADEH NIRI H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Auditory and Vestibular Research Journal Year:2005 | Volume:14 | Issue:23 Page(s): 1-5

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

836

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE LATENCY: HEADPHONE VERSUS BONE VIBRATOR PROCEDURES

Author(s)

ROUZBAHANI M. | KEYHANI MOHAMMAD REZA | HADDADZADEH NIRI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WAVE V LATENCYQ4

ACQ4

BCQ4

ABRQ3

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of Air conduction (AC) and Bone conduction (BC) auditory brain stem response (ABR) latencies. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 34 (17 males, 17 females) normal-hearing young subjects tested with AC- and BC-ABR. Wave V latencies of both procedures were compared Results: BC- WAVE V LATENCY significantly prolonged about 0.5 ms. that prolongation was less with decreasing intensity. Females' AC-and BC - ABR latencies were less than males'. Conclusion: AC- and BC- ABR appeared to be useful to determine sensory-neural ACuity in children with atresia or difficult to test subjects specially newborns.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ROUZBAHANI, M., KEYHANI, MOHAMMAD REZA, & HADDADZADEH NIRI, H.. (2005). AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE LATENCY: HEADPHONE VERSUS BONE VIBRATOR PROCEDURES. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 14(23), 1-5. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106280/en

Vancouver: Copy

ROUZBAHANI M., KEYHANI MOHAMMAD REZA, HADDADZADEH NIRI H.. AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE LATENCY: HEADPHONE VERSUS BONE VIBRATOR PROCEDURES. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH[Internet]. 2005;14(23):1-5. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106280/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ROUZBAHANI, MOHAMMAD REZA KEYHANI, and H. HADDADZADEH NIRI, “AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE LATENCY: HEADPHONE VERSUS BONE VIBRATOR PROCEDURES,” AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 1–5, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106280/en

Related Journal Papers