مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

9
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

4
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID 19 Diagnosis: A Meta Analysis

Pages

  23-36

Abstract

 Background: In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of Antigen test and Antibody test were assessed. Additional-ly, the difference of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were compared concerning efficacy of an-tibody test versus Antigen test for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. Methods: Online databases were searched for full-text publications and STATA software was used for data pooling and analysis before Sep 1st, 2022. Forrest plot was used to show the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. Combined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to show the area of under curve of complex data. Results: Overall, 25 studies were included. The sensitivity (0. 68, 95% CI: 0. 53-0. 80) and specificity (0. 99, 95% CI: 0. 98-0. 99) in antibody or antigen was calculated. The time point of test lead to heterogeneity. The area un-der curve (AUC) was 0. 98 (95% CI: 0. 96-0. 99), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 299. 54 (95% CI: 135. 61-661. 64). Subgroup analysis indicated Antibody test with sensitivity (0. 59, 95% CI: 0. 44-0. 73) and speci-ficity (0. 98, 95% CI: 0. 95-0. 99) and Antigen test with sensitivity of 0. 77 (95% CI: 0. 53-0. 91) and specificity of 0. 99 (95% CI: 0. 98-1. 00). Higher AUC and DOR were proved in Antigen test. Conclusion: The present study compared the efficacy of Antibody test versus Antigen test for COVID-19 di-agnosis. Better diagnostic efficacy, lower heterogeneity, and less publication bias of rapid Antigen testing was suggested in this study. This study would help us to make better strategy about choosing rapid and reliable test-ing method in diagnosis of the COVID-19 disease.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Fu, Haiyan, Sun, Lin, & Zhu, Jingwei. (2023). Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID 19 Diagnosis: A Meta Analysis. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 52(1), 23-36. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1099024/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Fu Haiyan, Sun Lin, Zhu Jingwei. Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID 19 Diagnosis: A Meta Analysis. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH[Internet]. 2023;52(1):23-36. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1099024/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Haiyan Fu, Lin Sun, and Jingwei Zhu, “Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID 19 Diagnosis: A Meta Analysis,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1099024/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button