مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

12
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

9
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of the Effects of Labial and Lingual Retraction of Canines Using Sliding Mechanics: an In-vivo Study

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare labial and lingual forces of the rate of Canine retraction and three dimensional control of the molar and canine using sliding mechanics. Methods: Ten patients with Angle’, s class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion referred for first premolar extraction enrolled in this split mouth study. Forty canines were placed into four groups according to the arch and type of force: UB (upper canine–, labial force), LB (lower canine–, labial force), UL (upper canine–, lingual force), and LL (lower canine–, lingual force). The rate of retraction of the canine, molar and canine rotation, molar and canine angulation, and molar anchorage loss in the sagittal and vertical plane was assessed using study models and orthopantomographs (OPG). The paired and unpaired t tests were used for intra and inter group comparison. The significance level was 0. 05. Results: The rate of Canine retraction was significantly faster for labial forces than lingual forces using sliding mechanics (P<0. 001). However, significantly greater amount of molar rotation was observed using lingual forces (P<0. 001). There was no significant difference regarding canine rotation using labial forces (P<0. 05). The molar anchorage loss in the sagittal plane was significantly lesser using lingual forces (P<0. 001). Conclusion: Canine retraction was faster when labial forces were applied using sliding mechanics whereas 3D-molar control was better when lingual forces were applied, which is advantageous for critical anchorage cases.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Ali, Sayyed Muhammad, Sodawala, Javed, Hamdani, Shaheen, Gandhi, Sumit, Malhotra, Harsha, & Agrawal, Gaurav. (2022). Comparison of the Effects of Labial and Lingual Retraction of Canines Using Sliding Mechanics: an In-vivo Study. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 17(2), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1117112/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Ali Sayyed Muhammad, Sodawala Javed, Hamdani Shaheen, Gandhi Sumit, Malhotra Harsha, Agrawal Gaurav. Comparison of the Effects of Labial and Lingual Retraction of Canines Using Sliding Mechanics: an In-vivo Study. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS[Internet]. 2022;17(2):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1117112/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Sayyed Muhammad Ali, Javed Sodawala, Shaheen Hamdani, Sumit Gandhi, Harsha Malhotra, and Gaurav Agrawal, “Comparison of the Effects of Labial and Lingual Retraction of Canines Using Sliding Mechanics: an In-vivo Study,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 0–0, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1117112/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button