COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF 60 CASES OF HEMORRHOIDECTOMY BY SUBMUCOSAL AND FERGUSON METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DERAKHSHANFAR AMIR; NIAYESH A.; KHANSARI SH.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Surgery Year:2009 | Volume:17 | Issue:2 Page(s): 63-70

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

880

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF 60 CASES OF HEMORRHOIDECTOMY BY SUBMUCOSAL AND FERGUSON METHODS

Author(s)

DERAKHSHANFAR AMIR | NIAYESH A. | KHANSARI SH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEMORRHOIDQ3

SUBMUCOSAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMYQ3

FERGUSON HEMORRHOIDECTOMYQ3

SURGERY METHODSQ4

COMPLICATIONSQ3

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy is one the accepted techniques of surgery but it has never been a popular operation. The advantage of this surgical method is that it minimizes the injury to anoderm and mucosa of anus. The aim of this study was to compare between submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy and Ferguson HEMORRHOIDectomy.Materials & Methods: In a clinical double-blind controlled trial, 60 patients with grade 3 and 4 HEMORRHOIDs were randomly divided into two groups: 1) submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy (30 patients) and 2) Ferguson HEMORRHOIDectomy (30 patients). These patients were evaluated for early and delayed post operative COMPLICATIONS such as pain, bleeding, urinary retention, constipation, fecal impaction, incontinency, surgical site infection, fissure, skin tag, mucosal ectropion, anal stenosis and recurrence. They were regularly followed up at 24 hours, 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after their operation.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between two these groups in terms of age, gender and grade of HEMORRHOID(s). Patients treated with submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy has significantly less pain within 24 hours after the surgery (P=0.026), but there was no statistically differences between two groups in anal stenosis and other COMPLICATIONS.Conclusions: Submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy is an effective method in reducing post operative pain within the 24 hours after the surgery and was no case of complicated anal stenosis after 6 months follow up. Other COMPLICATIONS in the submucosal technique were similar to those of Ferguson. Submucosal HEMORRHOIDectomy is comparable with Ferguson technique as a suitable procedure for high grade prolapsed HEMORRHOIDs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DERAKHSHANFAR, AMIR, NIAYESH, A., & KHANSARI, SH.. (2009). COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF 60 CASES OF HEMORRHOIDECTOMY BY SUBMUCOSAL AND FERGUSON METHODS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 17(2), 63-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112800/en

Vancouver: Copy

DERAKHSHANFAR AMIR, NIAYESH A., KHANSARI SH.. COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF 60 CASES OF HEMORRHOIDECTOMY BY SUBMUCOSAL AND FERGUSON METHODS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY[Internet]. 2009;17(2):63-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/112800/en

IEEE: Copy

AMIR DERAKHSHANFAR, A. NIAYESH, and SH. KHANSARI, “COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF 60 CASES OF HEMORRHOIDECTOMY BY SUBMUCOSAL AND FERGUSON METHODS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63–70, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/112800/en

Related Journal Papers