مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

7,399
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY

Pages

  67-73

Keywords

Abstract

 Background and purpose: Todays one of the most common anorectal problems is HEMORRHOID. Minor symptom of disease can be treated by medical treatment but at high grade disease we should consider SURGERY. Although conventional SURGERY is standard operation for HEMORRHOID, it is associated with some complication. Many technique were designed to overcome these problems. One of these procedures is LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDectomy that this study was done to compare it with conventional HEMORRHOIDectomy.Materials and methods: This was a randomized cilinical trial study of 60 patients with third degree or four-degree HEMORRHOID that was divided into two groups randomly. Operative time, bleeding, postoperative pains, rate of wound healing were recorded.Results: we randomized 60 patients, 30 to LIGASURE and 30 to conventional. There were no differences in patients demographic datas. Operative time, bleeding, pain at second postoperative day in LIGASURE group was less than the conventional. There was no difference in rate of healing, pain at first day postoperation and complications.Conclusion: LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDectomies is a safe and feasible procedure and in comparison with conventional HEMORRHOIDectomy cause more pain control and satisfaction.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAHMANI BOUINI, NASRIN, ALVANDIPOUR, MINA, HADIAN, HODA SADAT, & MOHAMMAD POUR, REZA ALI. (2012). RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 22(93), 67-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/45089/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAHMANI BOUINI NASRIN, ALVANDIPOUR MINA, HADIAN HODA SADAT, MOHAMMAD POUR REZA ALI. RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2012;22(93):67-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/45089/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NASRIN RAHMANI BOUINI, MINA ALVANDIPOUR, HODA SADAT HADIAN, and REZA ALI MOHAMMAD POUR, “RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 22, no. 93, pp. 67–73, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/45089/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button