COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK AND DAVIS TREATMENTMETHODS ON THE READING PERFORMANCE OF DYSLEXIC STUDENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZAMI EDRIS; HAJSADEGHI ZAHRA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ZANKO JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2017 | Volume:18 | Issue:58 Page(s): 1-14

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

891

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK AND DAVIS TREATMENTMETHODS ON THE READING PERFORMANCE OF DYSLEXIC STUDENTS

Author(s)

AZAMI EDRIS | HAJSADEGHI ZAHRA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NEUROFEEDBACKQ1

DAVIS TREATMENT METHODQ1

DYSLEXIC STUDENTSQ2

Abstract

Backgrounds and Aim: Dyslexia is a disorder in which progress in reading skills accordingto age, education and intelligence is lower than expected. The aim of tis study was tocompare the effectiveness of the NEUROFEEDBACK and DAVIS TREATMENT METHODs on the readingperformance of DYSLEXIC STUDENTS. Material and Methods: The statistical population of this study included all male studentswith reading disability in the third grade of elementary school from Ahvaz learning disorderscenters number 3 and 4 in 2015-2016. The study sample consisted of 45 DYSLEXIC STUDENTSwho were selected by perpouseful sampling and randomely divided into three groups (twoexperimental group and one control group) that each one consisting of 15 individuals. TheReading and Dyslexia Test of Golpour, Chamarkoohy and Mohammadamini (2012) was usedto test reading skills. For evaluating the intelligence of the students, the fourth version of theWechsler Intelligence Scale for children (2003) was used. Data were analysed by SPSS-20and Analysis of Covariance. Results: The results showed that after using the DAVIS TREATMENT METHOD, there was asignificant difference between the intervention and control groups on the performance of thestudents in all reading components (P<0. 01). Also, the effectiveness of NEUROFEEDBACKresaulted a significant difference in the performance of the students in all the components ofreading in the intervention groups compared to the control group (P<0. 01). Conclusion: This study showed that both methods affected the reading performance of thestudents and the Davis treatment had a greater effect compared to the NEUROFEEDBACK method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AZAMI, EDRIS, & HAJSADEGHI, ZAHRA. (2017). COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK AND DAVIS TREATMENTMETHODS ON THE READING PERFORMANCE OF DYSLEXIC STUDENTS. ZANKO JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 18(58 ), 1-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/113214/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZAMI EDRIS, HAJSADEGHI ZAHRA. COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK AND DAVIS TREATMENTMETHODS ON THE READING PERFORMANCE OF DYSLEXIC STUDENTS. ZANKO JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2017;18(58 ):1-14. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/113214/en

IEEE: Copy

EDRIS AZAMI, and ZAHRA HAJSADEGHI, “COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK AND DAVIS TREATMENTMETHODS ON THE READING PERFORMANCE OF DYSLEXIC STUDENTS,” ZANKO JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 18, no. 58 , pp. 1–14, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/113214/en

Related Journal Papers