A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Manohar Swati; Bazaz Negar; NEERAJA G.; SUBRAMANIAM PRIYA; Sneharaj N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Dental Research Journal Year:2022 | Volume:19 | Issue:12 Page(s): 00-00

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study

Author(s)

Keywords

Mineral trioxide aggregate

primary teeth

pulpotomy

tricalcium silicate

Abstract

Background: Preservation of pulpal vitality is of paramount importance as the vital functioning pulp is capable of initiating a unique reparative capacity. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars. Materials and Methods: This in vivo study included a total of 120 primary molars from 30 healthy children aged 3–, 9 years for regenerative pulpotomy procedure. The teeth were then divided by the lottery method (chits with names of materials on it) into four groups so that each child received all four of the regenerative materials,Group 1: Biodentine (BD)™, , Group II: Mineral trioxide aggregate Plus (MTA Plus™, ), Group III: Retro MTA (Retro MTA®, ), and Group IV: Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement. All the primary molars (1st/2nd molars) were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Data were subjected to the statistical analysis using the Chi‑, square test. The level of significance was considered as P < 0. 05. Results: Clinical evaluation showed 100% success with BD™,and CEM cement,whereas 96. 2% success was seen with MTA Plus™,and Retro MTA®, . On radiographic evaluation, MTA Plus™,and CEM cement showed 96. 2% success, whereas BD™,and Retro MTA®,showed 92. 59% success rate. Conclus

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Manohar, Swati, Bazaz, Negar, NEERAJA, G., SUBRAMANIAM, PRIYA, & Sneharaj, N.. (2022). A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study. DENTAL RESEARCH JOURNAL (DRJ), 19(12), 00-00. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1136362/en

Vancouver: Copy

Manohar Swati, Bazaz Negar, NEERAJA G., SUBRAMANIAM PRIYA, Sneharaj N.. A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study. DENTAL RESEARCH JOURNAL (DRJ)[Internet]. 2022;19(12):00-00. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1136362/en

IEEE: Copy

Swati Manohar, Negar Bazaz, G. NEERAJA, PRIYA SUBRAMANIAM, and N. Sneharaj, “A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study,” DENTAL RESEARCH JOURNAL (DRJ), vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 00–00, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1136362/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops