مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

940
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

NURSING STUDENT AND TEACHERS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD PRIORITIES IN TEACHERS EVALUATION

Pages

  18-28

Abstract

 Background & Aim: Recognition of strengths and weaknesses of EVALUATION content will help the educational manager to provide the possibility of EVALUATION quality improvement. The aim of this study was to determine the most important PRIORITIES of teacher performance EVALUATION from within STUDENTS’ and faculties’ perspective.Material & Methods: It was a descriptive cross- sectional study. All of the STUDENTS (n=245) and faculty members (n=26) of the School of Nursing and Midwifery affiliated with Zahedan University of Medical Sciences were recruited during the academic year 2008-2009. Data was collected using questionnaire with five subscales including teaching skills, individual characteristics of TEACHERS, communication skills, EVALUATION skills, and educational principles and rules and analyzed by SPSS-PC (v.13).Results: The most important PRIORITIES from the TEACHERS’ and STUDENTS’ perspective were related to the domains of teaching skills, teacher mastery, creating motivation and STUDENTS’ participation respectively. There were significant difference in the mean scores of TEACHERS mastery (p=0.02), STUDENTS’ participation (p=0.01), and presentation of new subjects (p=0.007) between the two groups. There was also significant difference in the mean scores of teaching skills domains, individual characteristics domain and EVALUATION skills domain between two groups (p=0.01).Conclusion: considering the difference between the TEACHERS’ and STUDENTS’ perspective regarding some criteria of TEACHERS EVALUATION, designing an EVALUATION tool according to the viewpoints of the two groups is recommended. TEACHERS’ attention to the STUDENTS PRIORITIES in TEACHERS EVALUATION would help to promote teaching quality and STUDENTS’ satisfaction.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KERMAN SARAVI, F., NAVIDIAN, A., & NAVABI RIGI, SH.D.. (2011). NURSING STUDENT AND TEACHERS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD PRIORITIES IN TEACHERS EVALUATION. IRAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (IJN), 24(72), 18-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/114340/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KERMAN SARAVI F., NAVIDIAN A., NAVABI RIGI SH.D.. NURSING STUDENT AND TEACHERS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD PRIORITIES IN TEACHERS EVALUATION. IRAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (IJN)[Internet]. 2011;24(72):18-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/114340/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. KERMAN SARAVI, A. NAVIDIAN, and SH.D. NAVABI RIGI, “NURSING STUDENT AND TEACHERS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD PRIORITIES IN TEACHERS EVALUATION,” IRAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (IJN), vol. 24, no. 72, pp. 18–28, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/114340/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top