STANDARD SETTING FOR OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAM USING FOUR METHODS: PRE-FIXED SCORE, ANGOFF, BORDERLINE REGRESSION AND COHEN’S

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JALILI MOHAMMAD; MORTAZHEJRI SARA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,194

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STANDARD SETTING FOR OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAM USING FOUR METHODS: PRE-FIXED SCORE, ANGOFF, BORDERLINE REGRESSION AND COHEN’S

Author(s)

JALILI MOHAMMAD | MORTAZHEJRI SARA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STANDARD SETTINGQ2

OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATIONQ2

ANGOFFQ2

BORDERLINE REGRESSION METHODQ2

COHEN METHODQ2

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Different methods have been introduced to determine the cut-scores of exams. However, they have been rarely used in our country. In this study, we used four methods to set a standard for pre-internship OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) in Tehran University of Medical Sciences.Methods: A pre-fixed score of 60% was considered in the first approach. In the ANGOFF method, a panel including 11faculty members was invited to estimate the probability of passing each station for a borderline student and mean of all estimations was considered as the station standard. In BORDERLINE REGRESSION METHOD, a linear regression model for each station was calculated in which the students’ checklist scores and general scores were considered as dependent and independent variables respectively. The station standard was calculated based on grade 2 in Likert scale. In Cohen’s method, we set the standard at 60% of the 95th percentile point.Results: The standards for the total test in the pre-fixed score, ANGOFF, borderline regression and Cohen’s methods were respectively 60, 49.15, 42.39 and 42.74. According to these standards, the percentages of passing students were respectively 21.9%, 67.6%, 93.3% and 92.4%.Conclusion: Using four methods to set standard of an OSCE showed that this approach for determining exam’s cut-score has significant effect on the calculated standard and the percent of students passing the exam.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JALILI, MOHAMMAD, & MORTAZHEJRI, SARA. (2012). STANDARD SETTING FOR OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAM USING FOUR METHODS: PRE-FIXED SCORE, ANGOFF, BORDERLINE REGRESSION AND COHEN’S. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 9(1), 77-84. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116870/en

Vancouver: Copy

JALILI MOHAMMAD, MORTAZHEJRI SARA. STANDARD SETTING FOR OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAM USING FOUR METHODS: PRE-FIXED SCORE, ANGOFF, BORDERLINE REGRESSION AND COHEN’S. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2012;9(1):77-84. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116870/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD JALILI, and SARA MORTAZHEJRI, “STANDARD SETTING FOR OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAM USING FOUR METHODS: PRE-FIXED SCORE, ANGOFF, BORDERLINE REGRESSION AND COHEN’S,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116870/en

Related Journal Papers