مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,114
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Pages

  50-59

Abstract

 Introduction: With the increasing popularity of performance-based assessments, it is necessary to employ proper indicators to ensure their quality. The present study examines the metrics of OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE).Methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional research in 10 pre-internship OSCE stations of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2012, the cut-off score was determined by borderline regression method and the failure rate was calculated. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was used to estimate error rate threshold. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and then, the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was determined. Alpha if item deleted, R2 coefficient, intergrade discrimination, difficulty and discrimination indices were calculated for each station. A total of 266 students participated in this exam.Results: A total of 266 students participated in this exam. The OSCE total cut-off score was 52.55 (out of 100). Four students (1.5%) failed the exam and the RMSE equaled 0.45. SEM was 4.84 and Cronbach’s alpha was calculated at 0.70 where the alpha if item deleted scores varied from 0.64 to 0.70. The R2 coefficient ranged from 0.16 to 0.85 and the intergrade discrimination ranged between 0.66 and 1.93. The ranges of difficulty and discrimination indices were 0.71-0.89 and 0.12-0.44 respectively.Conclusion: The internal consistency, SEM and threshold error rate were all acceptable. The alpha if item deleted was in the acceptable range in all stations. In two stations, the R2 value was lower than the desired range. The intergrade discrimination value was appropriate in all stations except one. The stations were not too difficult or highly discriminative which is considered favorable in criterion-referenced exams.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORTAZHEJRI, SARA, & JALILI, MOHAMMAD. (2017). ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 17(79), 50-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/59264/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORTAZHEJRI SARA, JALILI MOHAMMAD. ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2017;17(79):50-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/59264/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SARA MORTAZHEJRI, and MOHAMMAD JALILI, “ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 17, no. 79, pp. 50–59, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/59264/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button