COMPARING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO STUDY AND LEARNING IN PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL STAGES OF STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAKURNIA ABDOLHUSSEIN; GHAFOURIAN BOROUJERDNIA MEHRI; ELHAMPOUR HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2012 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 132-142

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

856

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO STUDY AND LEARNING IN PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL STAGES OF STUDY

Author(s)

SHAKURNIA ABDOLHUSSEIN | GHAFOURIAN BOROUJERDNIA MEHRI | ELHAMPOUR HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

APPROACHE TO THE STUDYQ2

MEDICAL STUDENTSQ3

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTQ2

APPROACHES AND STUDY SKILLS INVENTORY FOR STUDENTS (ASSIST)Q2

Abstract

Background & Objective: Approach to the study, as one of the factors affects students’ learning and achievement, is of a great importance. The aim of this study was to compare MEDICAL STUDENTS’ approaches to learning in pre-clinical and clinical years of study and its effect on their ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT.Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, a total of 137 MEDICAL STUDENTS in pre-clinical and clinical years of study in Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran, were evaluated by using Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaire. Grade point average of students in theoretical and practical courses was considered as an indicator of their ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT.Results: The most common approach to study and learning was deep approach (40.1%). In clinical years of study, a significant increase of using deep approach and significant decrease of using surface approach were observed. There was no significant difference between pre-clinical and clinical students in regard to their learning and study approaches (P=0.140). Learning and study approach showed significant relationship with students’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT (P=0.01).Conclusion: Due to the significance of using deep approach in learning, it is recommended that educational planners provide the best learning conditions to encourage students to take advantage of this study approach.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAKURNIA, ABDOLHUSSEIN, GHAFOURIAN BOROUJERDNIA, MEHRI, & ELHAMPOUR, HOSSEIN. (2012). COMPARING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO STUDY AND LEARNING IN PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL STAGES OF STUDY. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 9(2), 132-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116901/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAKURNIA ABDOLHUSSEIN, GHAFOURIAN BOROUJERDNIA MEHRI, ELHAMPOUR HOSSEIN. COMPARING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO STUDY AND LEARNING IN PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL STAGES OF STUDY. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2012;9(2):132-142. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116901/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLHUSSEIN SHAKURNIA, MEHRI GHAFOURIAN BOROUJERDNIA, and HOSSEIN ELHAMPOUR, “COMPARING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO STUDY AND LEARNING IN PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL STAGES OF STUDY,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 132–142, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116901/en

Related Journal Papers