مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,063
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NESTED-CASE CONTROL VERSUS CASE-COHORT STUDIES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW ON METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Pages

  64-72

Abstract

CASE-COHORT and NESTED CASE-CONTROL designs are the most well-known and cost-effective derivatives of prospective studies. Due to the popularity of these designs in recent years, the aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date description of them with respect to methodological issues such as sampling scheme, EFFECT MEASURE estimation, and analysis strategies. Overall, random sampling of controls in CASE-COHORT and matching for time in nested design are considered their hallmarks. Eventually, decision on a better design depends on study objectives, sub-cohort selection, case and control determination, and method of data collection. It should be kept in mind that any particular study requires unique elaboration and delicate examination to choose from the designs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOLAKOUIE NAIENI, K., MANSOURNIA, M.A., PANAHI, M.H., ELDUMA, A., & NEMATOLLAHI, SH.. (2016). NESTED-CASE CONTROL VERSUS CASE-COHORT STUDIES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW ON METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 12(3), 64-72. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/120609/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOLAKOUIE NAIENI K., MANSOURNIA M.A., PANAHI M.H., ELDUMA A., NEMATOLLAHI SH.. NESTED-CASE CONTROL VERSUS CASE-COHORT STUDIES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW ON METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY[Internet]. 2016;12(3):64-72. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/120609/en

    IEEE: Copy

    K. HOLAKOUIE NAIENI, M.A. MANSOURNIA, M.H. PANAHI, A. ELDUMA, and SH. NEMATOLLAHI, “NESTED-CASE CONTROL VERSUS CASE-COHORT STUDIES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW ON METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 64–72, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/120609/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button