مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

831
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AQUINA'S ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY AND PLATINGA'S CRITIQUE ON IT

Pages

  45-60

Abstract

 One of God existence proofs, is the CONTINGENCY argument that proves a necessary being through CONTINGENCY of beings. In the works of many Western and Islamic thinkers, the expression of this argument can be observed. The prominent philosopher and theologian of medieval period, Thomas AQUINAS, was one of the first scholars that argued for this proof in western theology and philosophy. His expression of the argument in fact was a combination of occurrence and his causality argument and affinity with the CONTINGENCY and Necessity argument in philosophy and Islamic theology.The present study has aimed to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of this expression while delineating the fundamentals and preliminaries of AQUINAS' Argument. The present study, based on Platinga's reviews, aimed to examine his expression of the argument influenced by Islamic thinkers, most notably Ibne Sina. Accordingly, the weaknesses of such an expression is revealed by comparing it to that of Ibne Sina.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHAMS, HOSSEIN. (2018). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AQUINA'S ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY AND PLATINGA'S CRITIQUE ON IT. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 14(1 ), 45-60. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123508/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHAMS HOSSEIN. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AQUINA'S ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY AND PLATINGA'S CRITIQUE ON IT. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2018;14(1 ):45-60. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123508/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HOSSEIN SHAMS, “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AQUINA'S ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY AND PLATINGA'S CRITIQUE ON IT,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 14, no. 1 , pp. 45–60, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123508/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button