MEANINGS OF ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ FROM THE MUSLIM PHILOSOPHERS' VIEWPOINT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVADI MOHSEN; MOHAMMADI SHIKHI QOBAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2008 | Volume:- | Issue:16 Page(s): 45-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,565

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MEANINGS OF ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ FROM THE MUSLIM PHILOSOPHERS' VIEWPOINT

Author(s)

JAVADI MOHSEN | MOHAMMADI SHIKHI QOBAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GOOD AND BADQ2

ASHAEREHQ2

MU’TAZELAQ2

SHIITESQ2

Abstract

The issue of GOOD AND BAD has been one of the most important issues which has attracted the attention of scholars. The theologians called Adliehinsist on the essentiality and rationality of moral goodness and badness of the rational individual’s actions. On the contraryAshaere insist on the divinity and legitimacy of such actions. The central question is what Muslim theologians meant by the words ‘good’, ‘bad’; ‘essentiality’, ‘rationality’; and divinity, legitimacy. In this present article, four distinct meanings are attributed to ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ and it is demonstrated that the disagreement between the Muslim Philosophers can be traced to the fourth meaning. Therefore, considering the domain of reality (ontology) together with the domain of knowledge (epistemology) the following four probabilities are discussed for the fourth meaning.A) ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ are ontologically based on divine will and they will be known by revelation.B) ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ are ontologically essentials of the actions and they will be known by revelation.C) ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ are ontologically based on divine will and they will be known by independent reason.D) ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ are ontologically essentials of the actions and will be known by independent reason.Ashaerehsupport the first option but Adlieh support one of the three other options.

Cites

No record.

References

QADI `ABDUL-JABBAR AL-MU`TAZILI'S MORAL THEORY

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVADI, MOHSEN, & MOHAMMADI SHIKHI, QOBAD. (2008). MEANINGS OF ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ FROM THE MUSLIM PHILOSOPHERS' VIEWPOINT. AYENEH MAREFAT, -(16), 45-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125256/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVADI MOHSEN, MOHAMMADI SHIKHI QOBAD. MEANINGS OF ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ FROM THE MUSLIM PHILOSOPHERS' VIEWPOINT. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2008;-(16):45-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125256/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHSEN JAVADI, and QOBAD MOHAMMADI SHIKHI, “MEANINGS OF ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ FROM THE MUSLIM PHILOSOPHERS' VIEWPOINT,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. -, no. 16, pp. 45–76, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125256/en

Related Journal Papers