CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REICHENBACH’S THEORY OF NATURAL EVILS THEODICY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASHFI ABD AL RASOUL; MASHAYEKHI AREZOU

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2012 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 (18) Page(s): 111-131

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

851

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REICHENBACH’S THEORY OF NATURAL EVILS THEODICY

Author(s)

KASHFI ABD AL RASOUL | MASHAYEKHI AREZOU | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THE PROBLEM OF EVILQ2

NATURAL EVILQ2

NATURAL LAWSQ2

THEODICYQ2

BRUCE R. REICHENBACHQ2

Abstract

Evils found in our world are seemingly inconsistent with the three divine attributes: "omniscience", "omnipotence" and "absolute benevolence". In other words, the four propositions: 1) God is omnipotent. 2) God is omniscient. 3) God is wholly good. 4) Evil exists are seemingly inconsistent. Some of atheists deny the existence of God on the fact that evils exist. There are two versions for "THE PROBLEM OF EVIL": "The logical problem," and "the evidential problem." Logical problem investigates the consistency or inconsistency of the four propositions, and the evidential problem evaluates the probability of the existence of God according to the amount, intensity and variety of evils. Theists have answered to this problem at two levels: the level of "defense" where, through various reasons, they reject the inconsistency of the four propositions and the level of "theodicy" in which the existence of evils is justified. Evils in the world are divided to "moral evils" and "natural evils". In this article we will consider the THEODICY of "natural laws" which is developed by BRUCE R. REICHENBACH, and try to illustrate its superiority to competing theories.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KASHFI, ABD AL RASOUL, & MASHAYEKHI, AREZOU. (2012). CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REICHENBACH’S THEORY OF NATURAL EVILS THEODICY. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 9(2 (18)), 111-131. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125798/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASHFI ABD AL RASOUL, MASHAYEKHI AREZOU. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REICHENBACH’S THEORY OF NATURAL EVILS THEODICY. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2012;9(2 (18)):111-131. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125798/en

IEEE: Copy

ABD AL RASOUL KASHFI, and AREZOU MASHAYEKHI, “CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REICHENBACH’S THEORY OF NATURAL EVILS THEODICY,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 9, no. 2 (18), pp. 111–131, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125798/en

Related Journal Papers