The distinction discovery/justification from view Reichenbach and Popper

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

EBADI AHMAD; Emdadi Masouleh Mohammad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2019 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 (27) Page(s): 197-214

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

534

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The distinction discovery/justification from view Reichenbach and Popper

Author(s)

EBADI AHMAD | Emdadi Masouleh Mohammad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

context of discoveryQ1

context of justificationQ1

ReichenbachQ1

PopperQ1

objectivityQ2

relativismQ2

Abstract

The distinction between context of discovery and context of justification is one of the major dichotomies in philosophy of science. Debates on its significance and implications are still alive. Reichenbach and Popper each have a different take on this issue. Reichenbach, by proposing the distinction, could respond to criticism of induction. Popper also discussed the distinction between discovery/justification in order to solve the problem of background of knowledge. From the perspective of both philosophers, the context of discovery cannot be analyzed, and methodology is merely determined by context of justification, but each of them has special components for this methodology, especially in the conceptualization of rational reconstruction. The application of the distinction discovery/justification by Reichenbach and Popper in the philosophy of science can be criticized in several ways. first the conversion of the distinction discovery/justification from harmless distinction into an absolute metaphysical dichotomy, which is made by making a normative framework in the process of scientific research, taking away mobility and dynamism from the researcher. Second, this separation is originated from a simplistic look at the flow of science production, so these two positions should have considered intertwined. Third, the role played by presuppositions in rejecting/accepting hypotheses as an arbitration that reflects the impact of historical, psychological and sociological components on the process of the formation of science. Fourth, the interaction of the internal and external structure of science is crucial in order to, properly understand the main aspects of scientific developments.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

EBADI, AHMAD, & Emdadi Masouleh, Mohammad. (2019). The distinction discovery/justification from view Reichenbach and Popper. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 11(1 (27) ), 197-214. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157445/en

Vancouver: Copy

EBADI AHMAD, Emdadi Masouleh Mohammad. The distinction discovery/justification from view Reichenbach and Popper. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2019;11(1 (27) ):197-214. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157445/en

IEEE: Copy

AHMAD EBADI, and Mohammad Emdadi Masouleh, “The distinction discovery/justification from view Reichenbach and Popper,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 11, no. 1 (27) , pp. 197–214, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157445/en

Related Journal Papers