COMPARISON OF ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS AND SOME CONVENTIONAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAZAVIAN HAMID; MOSLEH HAMID; EHTESHAMI AILIN; ZIAEI SANAZ; NAZERI RAHMAN; HEIDARI FARIBA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Dental School Year:2014 | Volume:10 | Issue:3 Page(s): 241-250

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

976

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS AND SOME CONVENTIONAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS

Author(s)

Keywords

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALISQ2

PROPOLISQ2

ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTSQ2

ROOT CANAL THERAPYQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Long-term and predictable endodontic treatment requires complete and effective debridement of the root canal system. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of PROPOLIS and some commonly used conventional irrigating solution as a ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS on ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS.Materials and Methods: A total of 60 one-rooted teeth with a root length of 13 mm were selected and the crowns were cut away. The samples were then cleaned, shaped and divided into 5 groups of 12. The irrigation solutions of 2.5% NaOCL, 1% iodine potassium iodide, 0.2% chlorhexidine, alcoholic extract of PROPOLIS and sterile ionized water (control group) were used in the study groups, respectively. Subsequently, the canals were contaminated with ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS and cultured once. Then the specimens were rinsed again with the irrigants mentioned above and cultures were obtained. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20 using t-test and one-way ANOVA (a=0.05).Results: The first and second cultures in all the groups were significantly different from the control group (p value=0.001). The first cultures exhibited significant differences between PROPOLIS and sodium hypochlorite (p value=0.025). In the second cultures there were significant differences between PROPOLIS and other groups and between iodine potassium iodide and other groups (p value<0.05) except for sodium hypochlorite (p value=0.116). In addition, there were significant differences between chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite (p value=0.002).Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, PROPOLIS exhibited better antibacterial effects on E. faecalis compared to other materials. In addition, all the irrigants had better antibacterial activity compared to water.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAZAVIAN, HAMID, MOSLEH, HAMID, EHTESHAMI, AILIN, ZIAEI, SANAZ, NAZERI, RAHMAN, & HEIDARI, FARIBA. (2014). COMPARISON OF ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS AND SOME CONVENTIONAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, 10(3), 241-250. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/126533/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAZAVIAN HAMID, MOSLEH HAMID, EHTESHAMI AILIN, ZIAEI SANAZ, NAZERI RAHMAN, HEIDARI FARIBA. COMPARISON OF ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS AND SOME CONVENTIONAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2014;10(3):241-250. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/126533/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID RAZAVIAN, HAMID MOSLEH, AILIN EHTESHAMI, SANAZ ZIAEI, RAHMAN NAZERI, and FARIBA HEIDARI, “COMPARISON OF ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS AND SOME CONVENTIONAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 241–250, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/126533/en

Related Journal Papers