مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

500
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparison between Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and Lidocaine Mandibular Block Anaesthesia in first Permanent Molars of Children Aged 8-11 Years

Pages

  17-25

Abstract

 Introduction: One of the most important issues in pediatric dentistry is pain control during treatment. The Inferior alveolar nerve block has some limitations as a conventional technique for the anesthesia of mandibular permanent molars, necessitating the use of alternative techniques, one of which is the Infiltration technique. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of inferior alveolar dental nerve block using Lidocaine with Infiltration technique with Articaine in mandibular first permanent molar anesthesia in children 8− 11 year of age. Materials & Methods: In this randomized cross-over clinical trial on 42 children 8− 11 year of age both mandibular first permanent molars were restored. Block or Infiltration injection was selected randomly. Patient's behavior was registered in two steps of injection and restoration using the SEM scores. For comparison of the two sides, Wilcoxon signed rank test and SPSS 20 were used (α = 0. 05). Results: Based on the results, the Infiltration technique resulted in a decrease in all the three SEM scores compared to block injection (p value < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the efficacy of these two anesthetic techniques (p value > 0. 05). Conclusion: It appears that Infiltration technique with Articaine is a better alternative for block technique with Lidocaine in the restoration of the mandibular first permanent molars.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Ahmadi Ruzbahani, Neda, GHASEMI, DAVOOD, & Tabatabaee, Leilasadat. (2019). A Comparison between Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and Lidocaine Mandibular Block Anaesthesia in first Permanent Molars of Children Aged 8-11 Years. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, 15(1 ), 17-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/126552/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Ahmadi Ruzbahani Neda, GHASEMI DAVOOD, Tabatabaee Leilasadat. A Comparison between Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and Lidocaine Mandibular Block Anaesthesia in first Permanent Molars of Children Aged 8-11 Years. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2019;15(1 ):17-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/126552/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Neda Ahmadi Ruzbahani, DAVOOD GHASEMI, and Leilasadat Tabatabaee, “A Comparison between Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and Lidocaine Mandibular Block Anaesthesia in first Permanent Molars of Children Aged 8-11 Years,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 15, no. 1 , pp. 17–25, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/126552/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top