مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,407
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF THREE OBSERVATIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS: A CASE STUDY IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY

Pages

  81-87

Abstract

 Background and Objectives: Posture analysis methods are used for risk assessment of work activities in the incidence of musculoskeletal disorders. It is expected that the level of assessed risk for a certain job will be the same with different methods. This study aimed to investigate the correlation among three methods of RULA, QEC, and REBA.Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on workers of 28 job groups in a steel complex. To evaluate the body position and postural stresses imposed on the workers, after taking pictures of different tasks, images were analyzed using RULA, QEC, and REBA methods and the risk levels were determined.Results: The correlation coefficient between RULA method and QEC and REBA methods was, respectively, 0.63 and 0.69, and it was calculated to be 0.56 between QEC and REBA methods, which was significant in all cases (p<0.01). Kappa agreement coefficient between RULA method and QEC and REBA methods was, respectively, 0.71 and 0.65, and it was calculated to be 0.36 between QEC and REBA methods, which was significant in all cases (p<0.01).Conclusion: The results of the present study provides a better understanding of different observational assessment methods of musculoskeletal disorders. These results could be beneficial, especially for ergonomic specialists in choosing assessment methods before adopting beneficial intervention measures.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SALIMI, SAJAD, HASHEMINEJAD, NASER, KANGAVARI, MAHDI, POUYAKIAN, MOSTAFA, & MOHAMMADPOUR, HASAN. (2016). COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF THREE OBSERVATIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS: A CASE STUDY IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY. QOM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 10(3), 81-87. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/132177/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SALIMI SAJAD, HASHEMINEJAD NASER, KANGAVARI MAHDI, POUYAKIAN MOSTAFA, MOHAMMADPOUR HASAN. COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF THREE OBSERVATIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS: A CASE STUDY IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY. QOM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL[Internet]. 2016;10(3):81-87. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/132177/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SAJAD SALIMI, NASER HASHEMINEJAD, MAHDI KANGAVARI, MOSTAFA POUYAKIAN, and HASAN MOHAMMADPOUR, “COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF THREE OBSERVATIONAL METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS: A CASE STUDY IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY,” QOM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 81–87, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/132177/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top